Skip to content

Conscious and Nonconscious Processes

Stanislas Dehaene

The MIT Press eBooks May 30, 2008 DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262195805.003.0002 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 14
Key points Proposes that conscious access corresponds to crossing a threshold in evidence accumulation within a distributed "global workspace" of recurrently connected, long-axon neurons that integrates and broadcasts evidence from multiple brain processors, whereas nonconscious processing accumulates evidence locally in specialized subcircuits without reaching the threshold for global ignition and conscious reportability.

Abstract

Among the many brain events evoked by a visual stimulus, which ones are associated specifically with conscious perception, and which merely reflect nonconscious processing? Understanding the neuronal mechanisms of consciousness is a major challenge for cognitive neuroscience. Recently, progress has been achieved by contrasting behavior and brain activation in minimally different experimental conditions, one of which leads to conscious perception whereas the other does not. This chapter reviews briefly this line of research and speculates on its theoretical interpretation. I propose to draw links between evidence accumulation models, which are highly successful in capturing elementary psychophysical decisions, and the conscious/nonconscious dichotomy. In this framework, conscious access would correspond to the crossing of a threshold in evidence accumulation within a distributed “global workspace,” a set of recurrently connected neurons with long axons that is able to integrate and broadcast back evidence from multiple brain processors. During nonconscious processing, evidence would be accumulated locally within specialized subcircuits, but would fail to reach the threshold needed for global ignition and, therefore, conscious reportability.

Citations in the library