Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness.
Alexander F G Maier, Naotsugu Tsuchiya
Attention, Perception & Psychophysics October 9, 2020 DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02146-4 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Humans Consciousness Hearing Electrophysiology Cognitive neuroscience Attention |
| Key findings | Argues that attention and consciousness are dissociable processes, a claim initially supported by behavioral data and increasingly tested with neuroscientific methods. The authors contend that progress requires combining neurophysiological and interventionist tools with quantitative, empirically testable theories of consciousness grounded in a mathematically formalized understanding of phenomenology. |
Abstract
Our conscious experience of the world seems to go in lockstep with our attentional focus: We tend to see, hear, taste, and feel what we attend to, and vice versa. This tight coupling between attention and consciousness has given rise to the idea that these two phenomena are indivisible. In the late 1950s, the honoree of this special issue, Charles Eriksen, was among a small group of early pioneers that sought to investigate whether a transient increase in overall level of attention (alertness) in response to a noxious stimulus can be decoupled from conscious perception using experimental techniques. Recent years saw a similar debate regarding whether attention and consciousness are two dissociable processes. Initial evidence that attention and consciousness are two separate processes primarily rested on behavioral data. However, the past couple of years witnessed an explosion of studies aimed at testing this conjecture using neuroscientific techniques. Here we provide an overview of these and related empirical studies on the distinction between the neuronal correlates of attention and consciousness, and detail how advancements in theory and technology can bring about a more detailed understanding of the two. We argue that the most promising approach will combine ever-evolving neurophysiological and interventionist tools with quantitative, empirically testable theories of consciousness that are grounded in a mathematically formalized understanding of phenomenology.
Citations in the library
Cited by 20
- Fronto-parietal networks shape human conscious report through attention gain and reorienting Communications Biology July 15, 2023
- Implicit-explicit gradient of nondual awareness or consciousness as such. Neuroscience of Consciousness October 8, 2021
- Vicarious attention, degrees of enhancement, and the contents of consciousness Philosophy and the Mind Sciences January 25, 2022
- Early Electrophysiological Correlates of Perceptual Consciousness Are Affected by Both Exogenous and Endogenous Attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience June 1, 2024
- Sensitivity to visual features in inattentional blindness. Elife May 19, 2025
and 15 more in the library
Cites 47
- The Brain's Default Mode Network Annual Review of Neuroscience May 4, 2015
- An information integration theory of consciousness BMC Neuroscience November 2, 2004
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Two neural correlates of consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences January 13, 2005
- Introduction to Research Topic – Binocular Rivalry: A Gateway to Studying Consciousness Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2012
and 42 more in the library