A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today.
Joseph E LeDoux, Matthias Michel, Hakwan Lau
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences March 13, 2020 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1921623117 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Historical analysis Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Animals Humans Behavior Consciousness Neurosciences History, 19th century History, 20th century Amnesia Blindsight Unconscious Split brain |
| Key points | Argues that contemporary consciousness research extends work begun in the late 19th century, especially studies from the 1950s to the 1970s with amnesia, split-brain, and blindsight patients. Across these groups, patients responded appropriately to stimuli they denied seeing or, for amnesiacs, having seen before, indicating that conscious knowing and reporting can be dissociated from mechanisms supporting meaningful behavior toward the same stimulus. |
Abstract
Consciousness is currently a thriving area of research in psychology and neuroscience. While this is often attributed to events that took place in the early 1990s, consciousness studies today are a continuation of research that started in the late 19th century and that continued throughout the 20th century. From the beginning, the effort built on studies of animals to reveal basic principles of brain organization and function, and of human patients to gain clues about consciousness itself. Particularly important and our focus here is research in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s involving three groups of patients-amnesia, split brain, and blindsight. Across all three groups, a similar pattern of results was found-the patients could respond appropriately to stimuli that they denied seeing (or in the case of amnesiacs, having seen before). These studies paved the way for the current wave of research on consciousness. The field is, in fact, still grappling with the implications of the findings showing that the ability to consciously know and report the identity of a visual stimulus can be dissociated in the brain from the mechanisms that underlie the ability to behave in a meaningful way to the same stimulus.
Citations in the library
Cited by 37
- Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there? Frontiers in Science October 30, 2025
- Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2025
- Taking consciousness for real: Increasing the ecological validity of the study of conscious vs. unconscious processes. Neuron May 15, 2024
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness. Elife May 28, 2025
- On the bright side of blindsight. Considerations from new observations of awareness in a blindsight patient. Cerebral Cortex January 8, 2025
and 32 more in the library
Cites 9
- Visual perception and phenomenal consciousness. Behavioural Brain Research November 1, 1995
- Understanding the Higher-Order Approach to Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences September 1, 2019
- Consciousness: The last 50 years (and the next). Brain and Neuroscience Advances 2018
- A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences February 15, 2017
- Awareness-related activity in prefrontal and parietal cortices in blindsight reflects more than superior visual performance. Neuroimage September 15, 2011
and 4 more in the library