Skip to content

Respiratory function in healthy long-term meditators: A cross-sectional comparative study

L. J. U. Karunarathne, Lakmali Amarasiri, A. D. A. Fernando

Heliyon July 22, 2023 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18585 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Cross-sectional Peer reviewed
Sample size 40
Population Healthy, skilled long-term Buddhist meditators and age-sex matched non-meditators in Sri Lanka
Intervention Buddhist meditation
Duration Meditators practiced consistently for more than 3 years
Citations 16
Key findings Long-term meditators showed slower resting respiratory rates, higher peak expiratory flow rates, and longer inspiratory breath-holding times than non-meditators, while six-minute walk distance and estimated maximal oxygen consumption did not differ. Greater lifetime meditation practice, longer daily sessions, and more retreat participation were associated with slower resting respiratory rates, and retreat duration with higher tidal volumes.

Abstract

Purpose: Respiratory function is thought to improve with long-term meditation. This study aimed to assess respiratory function in a cohort of healthy long-term meditators and non-meditators in Sri Lanka.

Methods: Respiratory function of healthy, skilled long-term meditators (n = 20) practicing Buddhist meditation consistently >3 years, and age-sex matched non-meditators (n = 20) were assessed by assessing resting respiratory rate, spirometry, breath-holding time and six-minute-walk distance. Data were analyzed with SPSS-23 statistical software.

Results: , were comparable. Long-term meditators had slower resting respiratory rates [mean (SD); 13.35 (1.9) vs. 18.37 (2.31) breaths/minute; p < 0.001], higher peak expiratory flow rates [mean (SD); 9.89 (2.5) vs. 8.22 (2.3) L/s; p = 0.03], and higher inspiratory breath-holding times [mean (SD); 74 (29.84) vs. 53.61 (26.83) seconds, p = 0.038] compared to non-meditators. There was no significant difference in the six-minute-walk distance and estimated maximal oxygen consumption between the two groups.Resting respiratory rate of long-term meditators, showed a significant negative correlation with total lifetime meditation practice in years (r = -0.444, p = 0.049), and the average length of a meditation session per day (r = -0.65, p = 0.002). The long-term meditators with longer duration of retreat participation demonstrated lower resting respiratory rate (r = -0.522, p = 0.018) and higher tidal volumes (r = 0.474, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Long-term meditators had significantly slower resting respiratory rates and longer breath-holding times, with better spirometry parameters than non-meditators. Greater practice duration and retreat experience appear to be associated with improved resting respiratory function in long-term meditators.

Citations in the library

Explore topics