Skip to content

Zen as Trans-Mysticism

Bret W. Davis

Zen Pathways February 10, 2022 DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780197573686.003.0013 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism Mysticism
Key points Argues that Zen is not a mysticism aimed at transcending the everyday, but a path to fully mindful engagement in ordinary life, one that passes through both the negation of unenlightened everydayness and the shedding of extraordinary mystical union. Drawing on Ueda Shizuteru's comparisons with Meister Eckhart, the author calls this path "trans-mysticism."

Abstract

Abstract This chapter explains why Zen cannot be sufficiently understood in terms of “mysticism,” if one means by mystical experience a transcendent or otherworldly experience that transports one beyond the mundane world. The path of Zen leads, rather, to a wholehearted and fully mindful engagement in the ordinary activities of everyday life. Zen master Zhaozhou says that “Everyday Even Mind is the Way,” and Zen master Linji tells us to “just be ordinary.” Nevertheless, the path to this enlightened everydayness requires passing through both a negation of unenlightened everydayness and a shedding of any extraordinary mystical experience of union with God (unio mystica) or oneness with the One. Drawing on Ueda Shizuteru’s comparisons of Zen with Meister Eckhart, the path of Zen is explained as that of a “trans-mysticism.”

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.

Explore topics