Skip to content

Quantifying representational mismatch between narratives and structured reports in near-death experiences

Cristian Pulido, Francisco Gómez, Prejaas K.b. Tewarie, Roxane Hoyer, Steven Laureys

preprint DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.7315140 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study comparing questionnaire-derived and narrative-derived labels
Sample size 190
Population Near-death experience reports
Measures NDE-C, LCI-R
Topics Near-death experience
Key findings Questionnaire-derived and narrative-derived labels for near-death experiences agreed systematically but incompletely, with stronger correspondence for experiential features (NDE-C macro-F1 = 0.62) than life changes (LCI-R = 0.52) and only partial correspondence for narrative tone versus self-reported valence (macro-F1 = 0.43). The authors argue that this disagreement reflects a structured property of reporting, which they call representational mismatch, rather than measurement or extraction error alone.

Abstract

Near-death experiences (NDEs) are often studied using both structured questionnaires and narrative reports, yet these representations cannot be assumed to provide interchangeable representations of the same experience. Narratives allow flexible expression of different aspects of the experience, whereas questionnaires organize reports into predefined dimensions and retrospective evaluations. How disagreement between these formats should be quantified and interpreted remains unclear. This study operationalized this disagreement as representational mismatch by comparing questionnaire-derived and narrative-derived labels across 190 NDE reports. Narratives were coded using 12 large language models (LLMs), complemented by human-reference annotation, a lexical baseline, external sentiment benchmarks, and preprocessing sensitivity analyses. Correspondence was evaluated across emotional tone, experiential features (NDE-C), and post-experience life changes (LCI-R).Agreement was systematic but incomplete and differed across representational domains. Experiential features showed stronger correspondence than life changes (NDE-C macro-F1 = 0.62 [0.60, 0.65] vs. LCI-R = 0.52 [0.50, 0.54]). Narrative tone contained meaningful affective information but corresponded only partially with global self-reported valence (macro-F1 = 0.43 [0.41, 0.44]), with disagreement concentrated mainly in mixed and neutral narrative-tone assignments rather than direct polarity reversals. Standard sentiment benchmarks showed substantially higher correspondence (macro-F1 = 0.78 ± 0.16), making a purely general model-limitation explanation less plausible.These findings support interpreting cross-format disagreement as a structured property of reporting rather than measurement or extraction error alone. Representational mismatch provides a framework for identifying where different reporting formats converge, where they cease to be interchangeable, and how the elicitation format shapes what becomes observable in research on subjective experience.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on near-death experience, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Fantasy Proneness Correlates With the Intensity of Near-Death Experience Individuals who have experienced a near-death experience (classical or NDE-like) and... 2018 Cross-sectional survey n = 228
A systematic analysis of distressing near-death experience accounts Individuals who had a near-death experience and wrote down their account 2019 Cross-sectional study n = 123
Reduced death threat in near-death experiencers Adults who had near-death experiences, came close to death without NDE, or never came... 1992 Cross-sectional study n = 290
Near-Death Experiences in a Psychiatric Outpatient Clinic Population Psychiatric outpatients 2003 Cross-sectional survey n = 832
Near-Death States Reported in a Sample of 50 Misusers Previous ketamine misusers who reported a ketamine-related near-death experience 2010 Cross-sectional survey n = 50

Citations in the library

Explore topics