Skip to content

Experience and Time: A Metaphysical Approach

David Builes, Michele Odisseas Impagnatiello

Analytic Philosophy February 11, 2026 DOI: 10.1111/phib.70001 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Citations 2
Key points Argues that the popular view that basic conscious experiences are temporally extended is implausible because it makes experience depend on the future, and defends an alternative account of the temporal structure of experience. Contends that this issue is deeply interconnected with debates about the vagueness of consciousness, physicalism, intrinsic phenomenal properties, cognitive 'overflow', and natural necessity.

Abstract

ABSTRACT What is the temporal structure of conscious experience? While it is popular to think that our most basic conscious experiences are temporally extended, we will be arguing against this view, on the grounds that it makes our conscious experiences depend on the future in an implausible way. We then defend an alternative view of the temporal structure of experience from a variety of different objections. Along the way, we hope to illustrate the wider philosophical ramifications of the relationship between experience and time. What one thinks about the temporal structure of experience is, we believe, deeply interconnected with issues concerning whether consciousness is vague or precise, whether conscious states can be reduced to physical states, whether phenomenal properties are intrinsic properties, and whether phenomenal consciousness can “overflow” access consciousness. As we will see, even seemingly unrelated metaphysical questions, such as the debate between Humean and Non‐Humean accounts of natural necessity, bear on questions about the relationship between experience and time.

Citations in the library

Explore topics