The mind as function: The functionalist approach to the mind–body problem
Cambridge University Press eBooks January 27, 1995 DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139173872.007 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that functionalism, as developed by Hilary Putnam and Jerry Fodor, is a major and theoretically broad approach to the mind-body problem, and that both philosophers address wider epistemological and psychoanthropological issues and take positions on materialism, physicalism, and reductionism. |
Abstract
PUTNAM: THE ATTACK ON MATERIALISM AND PHYSICALISM In the debate engaging the contemporary philosophy of mind the functionalist movement has proved to be an extremely lively, complex, and epistemologically formidable contender. Functionalism has addressed themes and issues of crucial importance to the mindbody relationship: the nature of mental states, the structure of psychological explanation, the possible autonomy of psychology as a science, and the problems of reduction and nomology in psychological analysis. Its investigation covers epistemological and (meta)psychological terrain and is carried out on different levels at once. We shall limit ourselves, however, to examining certain theoretical points of particular pertinence to our present concerns and to consider two philosophers who have emerged from a variety of currents as the foremost champions of functionalism: Hilary Putnam and Jerry Fodor. The most striking quality of the output of Putnam and Fodor is the theoretical breadth. Unlike many mbp specialists, neither Fodor nor much less Putnam (whose foreground role in contemporary philosophy scarcely needs underscoring) confines himself to a ‘technical’ approach to the question of the relationship between mind and body. On the contrary, both carry out their investigations within a much broader context and assume clear positions on the far-reaching psychoanthropological and epistemological implications of the problem. Not surprisingly, then, Putnam and Fodor take determined stands on issues of general concern to philosophy such as materialism, physicalism, and reductionism.