Magnetoencephalography monitoring of hypnosis-induced modulation of event-related brain responses by hypnosis
H. Sid-Ahmed, J. Alayrangues, L. Langar, N. Richard, V. Albaladejo, S. Pezzani, V. Brun, Daniel Anglade, V. Auboiroux
Neuroscience of Consciousness August 26, 2026 DOI: 10.1093/nc/niag051 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 20 |
| Population | Volunteers with different suggestibility levels |
| Key findings | Auditory cortex and sensor amplitudes were significantly reduced during hypnotic trance and distraction relative to critical consciousness, for both standard and deviant stimuli, independent of suggestibility; a subtle significant difference was found between distraction and hypnosis in source space, suggesting altered auditory responses could mark the hypnotic process. |
Abstract
Abstract Hypnosis is increasingly used in a medical context. However, the hypnotic process is dynamic, and we currently lack specific and reliable biomarkers to diagnose and rigorously monitor the patient’s response to hypnotic suggestions. Here, we aimed to identify physiological biomarkers by investigating cerebral event-related responses in an oddball paradigm using a magnetoencephalography-based method. Twenty volunteers with different suggestibility levels were exposed to standard and deviant sounds as part of an oddball paradigm. Subjects were monitored in three distinct conditions: critical consciousness, while distracted by listening to a story, and during hypnotic trance. In each condition, event-related responses were analyzed in both a source space (auditory cortex and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex) and a sensor space in a minimalistic scenario (two sensors). The statistical analysis revealed significant reductions in amplitudes in the auditory cortex and in sensor measurements during hypnotic trance and distraction relative to critical consciousness. These reductions in amplitudes were observed for both standard and deviant stimuli, regardless of the level of hypnotic suggestibility. In particular, this study aimed to determine whether auditory responses are reduced even without explicit suggestions of induced deafness. A more subtle, but nevertheless statistically significant, difference was also found between the distraction and the hypnotic conditions in the source space. The modulation of the cortical response to auditory stimuli during hypnosis could be used as a physiological marker of the hypnotic process. Hypnotic trance and distraction do not appear to differ significantly, as both seem to induce a similar alteration of critical consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cites 9
- Plasticity changes in the brain in hypnosis and meditation Contemporary Hypnosis October 30, 2009
- Is Hypnotic Induction Necessary to Experience Hypnosis and Responsible for Changes in Brain Activity? Brain Sciences May 29, 2023
- Electroencephalography Oscillations During Prehypnosis and Hypnosis in Subjects With High and Low Dissociative Experiences. Basic and clinical neuroscience 2025
- Hypnotic Induction of Deafness to Elementary Sounds: An Electroencephalography Case-Study and a Proposed Cognitive and Neural Scenario. Frontiers in Neuroscience 2022
- Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses. PLoS One March 4, 2021
and 4 more in the library