Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Suggested deafness during hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis compared to a distraction and control condition: A study on subjective experience and cortical brain responses.

Marcel Franz, Barbara Schmidt, Holger Hecht, Ewald Naumann, Wolfgang H. R. Miltner

PLoS One March 4, 2021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240832 (opens in new tab) via DOAJ

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Hypnosis can alter how people process and perceive sounds, but complete deafness is difficult to achieve. In an experiment with 48 participants, an auditory oddball task was performed under four conditions: hypnosis with a suggestion that an earplug blocked hearing, simulation of hypnosis, distraction by a film, and a control condition. Hypnosis and simulation both reduced target detection rates, response times, and the P3b brainwave amplitude compared to control and distraction conditions. Loudness ratings dropped only during hypnosis. Brain source analysis showed that a small set of neural areas involved in attention, sound discrimination, and response organization accounted for the differences. The authors suggest the term 'hypoacusis' (reduced hearing) is more accurate than 'deafness' for this effect.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Within-subjects experimental design Peer reviewed
Sample size 48
Population Participants (likely healthy adults, not further specified)
Intervention simulation of hypnosis
Duration Single session (no duration stated)
Key finding Hypnosis and simulation of hypnosis both reduced target hit rates, response times, and P3b amplitude, but only hypnosis reduced loudness ratings, indicating that deafness suggestions alter auditory processing but do not produce complete deafness.

Abstract

Hypnosis is a powerful tool to affect the processing and perception of stimuli. Here, we investigated the effects of hypnosis on the processing of auditory stimuli, the time course of event-related-potentials (ERP; N1 and P3b amplitudes) and the activity of cortical sources of the P3b component. Forty-eight participants completed an auditory oddball paradigm composed of standard, distractor, and target stimuli during a hypnosis (HYP), a simulation of hypnosis (SIM), a distraction (DIS), and a control (CON) condition. During HYP, participants were suggested that an earplug would obstruct the perception of tones and during SIM they should pretend being hypnotized and obstructed to hear the tones. During DIS, participants' attention was withdrawn from the tones by focusing participants' attention onto a film. In each condition, subjects were asked to press a key whenever a target stimulus was presented. Behavioral data show that target hit rates and response time became significantly reduced during HYP and SIM and loudness ratings of tones were only reduced during HYP. Distraction from stimuli by the film was less effective in reducing target hit rate and tone loudness. Although, the N1 amplitude was not affected by the experimental conditions, the P3b amplitude was significantly reduced in HYP and SIM compared to CON and DIS. In addition, source localization results indicate that only a small number of neural sources organize the differences of tone processing between the control condition and the distraction, hypnosis, and simulation of hypnosis conditions. These sources belong to brain areas that control the focus of attention, the discrimination of auditory stimuli, and the organization of behavioral responses to targets. Our data confirm that deafness suggestions significantly change auditory processing and perception but complete deafness is hard to achieve during HYP. Therefore, the term 'deafness' may be misleading and should better be replaced by 'hypoacusis'.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment