Skip to content

Assessment of the MDA and MDMA optical isomers in a stimulant-hallucinogen discrimination.

L E Baker, M M Taylor

Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior August 1997 DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00334-6 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational study using a three-choice drug discrimination procedure Peer reviewed
Sample size 24
Population Male Sprague-Dawley rats
Interventions MDMA MDA S(+)-amphetamine mescaline LSD cocaine DOM
Dose S(+)-amphetamine 1.0 mg/kg, mescaline 12.5 mg/kg, LSD 0.08 mg/kg
Topics MDMA
Key findings All isomers of MDA and MDMA produced few responses on the amphetamine lever. R(-)-MDA and R(-)-MDMA substituted nearly completely for mescaline, and R(-)-MDA substituted nearly completely for LSD, while both MDMA isomers and S(+)-MDA partially substituted for LSD. These results do not support previous reports that S(+)-MDMA substitutes for amphetamine.

Abstract

The phenylisopropylamine derivatives 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) have been compared to both psychostimulants and hallucinogens in drug discrimination investigations. The stereoisomers of these compounds, in particular those of MDA, appear to produce differential effects. Previous studies have demonstrated that animals trained to discriminate amphetamine from vehicle generalize to the S(+)-isomers but not the R(-)-isomers of MDA and MDMA while animals trained to discriminate LSD from saline generalize to R(-)-MDA and neither isomer of MDMA. However, animals trained to discriminate mescaline from vehicle generalize to both stereoisomers of these phenylisopropylamine derivatives. The present study consisted of two experiments in which a three-choice drug discrimination procedure was employed to compare the stereoisomers of MDA and MDMA to both amphetamine and either mescaline (experiment one) or LSD (experiment two). Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate S(+)-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and mescaline (12.5 mg/kg) and eight rats were trained to discriminate S(+)-amphetamine (1.0 mg/kg) and LSD (0.08 mg/kg) from saline in three-choice, food reinforced drug discrimination procedures. Substitution tests were administered with the isomers of MDA and MDMA. In the second experiment, substitution tests were also administered with lower doses of each training compound and with the stimulant cocaine and the hallucinogen 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenylisopropylamine (DOM). In both experiments, all of the isomers produced very few responses on the S(+)-amphetamine lever. In the first experiment, R(-)-MDA and R(-)-MDMA produced nearly complete substitution for mescaline. The results of the second experiment revealed partial substitution for LSD with both isomers of MDMA and S(+)-MDA, and nearly complete substitution with R(-)MDA for LSD. The present findings do not support previous reports that S(+)-MDMA and S(+)-MDMA substitute for S(+)-amphetamine. The three-lever drug discrimination procedure may provide a more sensitive behavioral assay in which to examine the discriminative stimulus effects of drugs with compound stimulus properties.

Comparable studies

Other preclinical and animal studies on MDMA, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Cited by 24

and 19 more in the library

Cites 16

and 11 more in the library

Explore topics