Skip to content

A three-choice discrimination procedure dissociates the discriminative stimulus effects of d-amphetamine and (±)-MDMA in rats.

A. K. Goodwin, L. E. Baker

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2000 DOI: 10.1037//1064-1297.8.3.415 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Drug discrimination study Peer reviewed
Population Rats
Interventions MDMA d-amphetamine cocaine LSD 2 5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine fenfluramine MDA pirenpirone
Topics MDMA Serotonin
Keywords Hallucinogen Fenfluramine Stimulant Dextroamphetamine Stimulus control Pharmacology Stimulus generalization
Citations 44
Key points MDMA and d-amphetamine can be established as discriminative stimuli in rats using a three-choice operant procedure, with fenfluramine and both isomers of MDA fully substituting for MDMA, while LSD nearly completely substituted for MDMA and cocaine fully substituted for d-amphetamine.

Abstract

(+/-)-3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) produces subjective effects in humans that are similar to, but distinguishable from, those of psychostimulants. Drug discrimination studies in nonhumans have yielded inconsistent results regarding the similarities between MDMA and the psychomotor stimulant d-amphetamine. This study successfully used a 3-choice operant procedure to establish MDMA and d-amphetamine as discriminative stimuli in rats. Cocaine produced complete substitution for d-amphetamine, and LSD produced dose-dependent increases in MDMA-appropriate responding with nearly complete substitution (78%) for MDMA. The hallucinogen 2,5-dimethoxy-4-bromoamphetamine only partially substituted for MDMA and severely disrupted response rate. Fenfluramine and both isomers of 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) all produced complete substitution for MDMA. The serotonin-receptor antagonist pirenpirone only partially blocked MDMA discrimination.

Explore topics