Skip to content

Toward an integrated cognitive–contemplative framework for student mental health: a conceptual analysis of vedic psychological principles and cognitive behavioral therapy in education

Smrithy G S, Balaji Chandrasekaran

Frontiers in Education April 30, 2026 DOI: 10.3389/feduc.2026.1817984 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key points Proposes the Cognitive–Contemplative Educational Framework (CCEF), which integrates CBT with Vedic psychological concepts to address student mental health. Argues that this integration offers a structured foundation for future empirical validation and interdisciplinary discourse on student well-being.

Abstract

The increasing levels of anxiety, stress, academic burnout, and emotional dysregulation among students represent a significant global educational concern. Although Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) remains one of the most empirically validated methods for reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in young populations, its application in educational settings often emphasizes immediate cognitive restructuring rather than long-term self-regulatory development. Concurrently, contemplative educational approaches have drawn on classical Vedic psychological principles, including meta-cognitive awareness, disciplined mental training, and process-oriented engagement. Despite conceptual overlaps, a systematic theoretical integration of structured CBT models and Vedic cognitive frameworks remains underdeveloped in educational research. This paper presents a conceptual analysis culminating in the proposed Cognitive–Contemplative Educational Framework (CCEF). The framework maps CBT constructs to Vedic concepts such as Sakshi-bhava (witness consciousness), Vairagya (detachment), Abhyasa (disciplined practice), and Karma Yoga (process-oriented action). The study examines epistemological distinctions, psychological mechanisms, pedagogical implications, and future research directions. The proposed framework contributes to interdisciplinary discourse on student mental health and well-being in education and provides a structured foundation for future empirical validation.

Citations in the library

Explore topics