Skip to content

Negative effects of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy for patients with ‘difficult to treat’ depression: protocol for a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis

Maria Niemi, Johannes Michalak, Maria Velana, Thorsten Barnhofer, Mathias Harrer

BMJ Open April 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106362 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review protocol Randomized Peer reviewed
Population Adults with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD)
Interventions Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) Cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP)
Measures Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Topics Depression Meditation
Key findings This protocol outlines a planned systematic review and IPD network meta-analysis to compare the incidence of clinically relevant negative outcomes between MBCT and CBASP in adults with DTD. The primary outcome is clinically significant deterioration (≥6-point increase on PHQ-9), with secondary outcomes of suicidality and dropout. The authors propose to integrate direct and indirect evidence to examine moderators of deterioration.

Abstract

Introduction Mindfulness-based interventions are widely used, yet concerns about potential negative effects—particularly those related to mindfulness meditation practice—have gained increasing attention. Individuals with difficult-to-treat depression (DTD) represent a population of particular relevance due to heightened vulnerability, but comparative evidence on clinically relevant negative outcomes of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) versus established alternative psychotherapies in this group is lacking. This protocol describes a systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) network meta-analysis to assess and compare the incidence of clinically relevant negative outcomes associated with MBCT and the cognitive behavioural analysis system of psychotherapy (CBASP), an established individual psychotherapy for DTD. Methods and analysis Randomised controlled trials of MBCT and CBASP for adults with DTD were identified through systematic searches of major databases. Eligible studies must compare MBCT or CBASP (alone or with treatment as usual) to each other or to control groups. The primary outcome is clinically significant deterioration, defined as a ≥6-point increase on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 or equivalent. Secondary outcomes are suicidality and treatment dropout. IPD will be requested from trial investigators; aggregate data will be used when IPD is unavailable. One-stage random-effects IPD network meta-analyses will be conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and to examine participant-level moderators of deterioration. Adverse events reported in the included trials will be summarised descriptively at the study level. Ethics and dissemination No local ethical review was required following consultation with the Swedish Ethical Review Authority. Primary trial investigators obtained local ethical approval and will share pseudonymised IPD. Findings will inform clinical decision-making and guideline development by strengthening the evidence base on potential negative effects of MBCT and CBASP in adults with DTD, including identification of subgroups at increased risk. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and accessible summaries for relevant stakeholders. PROSPERO registration number CRD42022332039

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on depression, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Ketamine and Other NMDA Antagonists: Early Clinical Trials and Possible Mechanisms in Depression Participants with major depression in placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized... 2015 Systematic review and meta-analysis
Side-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review. Patients with depression 2018 Systematic review
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Adults with unipolar or bipolar major depression 2020 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 1,877
Single-dose infusion ketamine and non-ketamine N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists for unipolar and bipolar depression: a meta-analysis of efficacy, safety and time trajectories Patients with major depressive disorder or bipolar depression 2016 Systematic review and meta-analysis n = 588
Therapeutic effects of classic serotonergic psychedelics: A systematic review of modern‐era clinical studies Patients with cancer- or illness-related anxiety and depression, major depressive... 2020 Systematic review n = 188

Citations in the library

Explore topics