Skip to content

The Effects of Mindfulness on Shame: Exploring Mediation by Cognitive Flexibility and Self-Compassion in a Chinese Adult Population.

Xiaoshuo Zhang, Jinghong Wang, Yuzheng Wang, Jinyan Wang, Fei Luo

PsyCh Journal December 10, 2024 DOI: 10.1002/pchj.817 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Cross-sectional study plus longitudinal follow-up study Peer reviewed
Sample size 481
Population Chinese adults in Beijing and Chengdu (481 in Study 1; 128 followed up in Study 2)
Duration 8-month follow-up (Study 2)
Measures Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, Cognitive Flexibility Inventory, Self-Compassion Scale, Self-Conscious Affect-3
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Cross-sectional studies Shame Empathy Self concept Cognition Middle aged China Female Young adult Surveys and questionnaires East asian people Cognitive flexibility Self‐compassion
Key findings Mindfulness was negatively associated with shame cross-sectionally and predicted lower shame 8 months later, while shame did not predict later mindfulness. Cognitive flexibility and self-compassion fully mediated the cross-sectional mindfulness-shame link, suggesting both may explain how mindfulness relates to reduced shame.

Abstract

To examine the effects of mindfulness on shame and the mechanisms mediated by cognitive flexibility and self-compassion in a Chinese adult population in daily life, we conducted two studies. Study 1 was a cross-sectional study using the Five-Factor Mindfulness Questionnaire, the Cognitive Flexibility Inventory, the Self-Compassion Scale, and the Self-Conscious Affect-3, which were administered to 481 adults in Beijing and Chengdu. For Study 2, an 8-month follow-up study was conducted on 128 of the adults. The results of Study 1 showed that (1) the awareness of action and nonjudgment dimensions, and the total score of mindfulness were significantly correlated with shame; (2) cognitive flexibility and self-compassion could fully mediate the prediction of mindfulness on shame. The Study 2 showed that (1) mindfulness and shame were significantly negatively correlated in both phases of measurement; (2) controlling for T1 shame, T1 mindfulness was able to negatively predict T2 shame; controlling for T1 mindfulness, T1 shame was not able to predict T2 mindfulness. There is a longitudinal association between mindfulness and shame, and only mindfulness scores are predictive of the shame and not vice-versa; both cognitive flexibility and self-compassion can provide explanations for the prediction of shame by mindfulness. Enhancing levels of mindfulness can help alleviate individuals' shame levels.

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Explore topics