Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

A Postmodern (Singularity) Future with a Post-Human Godless Algorithm: Trans-Humanism, Artificial Intelligence, and Dataism

Khaled Al-Kassimi

Religions August 17, 2023 DOI: 10.3390/rel14081049 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

This manuscript argues that understanding the ethical consequences of a post-human condition in transhumanist ontology is hindered by postmodern epistemology, which lacks metaphysical and theological foundations. The author traces transhumanism's philosophical genealogy from modern to postmodern epistemology, contending that its ideology—marked by the 'death of God' and 'death of human'—pursues an ateleological state that worships technology. The text deconstructs concepts like Singularity, Artificial Super Intelligence, and Dataism, and critiques transhumanist proponents for anthropomorphizing AI while altering sacred definitions of consciousness and intelligence. Drawing on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics and Al-Ghazali's Alchemy of Happiness, the author proposes that ignoring Dataism's implications obscures virtuous techne and the pursuit of eudaimonia.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Humanism Postmodernism Telos Philosophy Epistemology
Citations 17
Key finding Argues that transhumanist ideology, rooted in postmodern epistemology, undermines metaphysical and theological essence, and that its technological worship obscures the virtuous use of techne and the pursuit of eudaimonia.

Abstract

The objective of this manuscript is to reveal that the challenge in understanding the ethical consequences of a post-human condition characterizing trans-humanist ontology is linked to postmodern epistemology lacking any metaphysical and theological essence. The introductory section provides an overview of trans-humanist thought and the concerns deliberated against it at the recent conference titled A.I Ethics: An Abrahamic Commitment to the Rome Call, charting a path ensuring that technological innovations do not undermine the ethical, spiritual, and moral values animating the telos of the human being. The second section traces the philosophical genealogy of trans-humanism from the Age of Reason (i.e., modern epistemology) to our current Age of Feeling (i.e., postmodern epistemology). This section also stresses that the ontology accenting both periods—the death of God and the death of human—is latent in trans-humanist ideology, which seeks to extinguish the quest of knowing God with an ateleological state that crucifies the human in pursuit of worshipping technology. The third section scrutinizes the conceptual framework of trans-humanism by deconstructing concepts structuring its worldview such as Singularity, Artificial Super Intelligence, and the pseudo-religion known as Dataism. Additionally, this section examines how trans-humanist proponents—while adhering to postmodern philosophy—alter the definitions of sacred concepts that exclusively animate a human state of being, such as consciousness, intelligence, and awareness, by anthropomorphizing AI. The final section recalls the wisdom of the Nicomachean Ethics and the Alchemy of Happiness, composed—respectively—by Aristotle and Al-Ghazali. It highlights the immoral significances of choosing to ignore the implications of Dataism and its techno-scientific objectives, which obscure the use of techne in a virtuous manner attaining eudaimonia and the essence of humanness seeking a path—using God-given sensoria—knowledge of Divine Beauty.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment