Horizonality Under Pressure: A Limit Phenomenology of Religion
Lorand Bruhacs
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) May 12, 2026 preprint DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20137868 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism Philosophy of mind |
| Keywords | Phenomenology philosophy Salient Existentialism Argument complex analysis Subject documents Epistemology Closure psychology Summons |
| Key points | Argues that religious and mystical appearances arise from finite motifs resisting closure and being inhabited under limit-forms, which are Husserlian horizonality under existential pressure, and that religious practices stabilize these limit-appearances as sacred and transformative. |
Abstract
One recurrent source of religious and mystical appearance lies in the way finite motifs resist finite closure and come to be inhabited under maximal, unconditioned, or unsurpassable forms. We call these forms limit-forms and argue that they are Husserlian horizonality under existential pressure: ordinary experience always exceeds what is presently given, but some horizons become absolute-seeming, claim the subject as a whole, and become religiously inhabitable. The phenomenological hinge is claim: limit-pressure becomes religiously salient when finite non-closure is lived not merely as lack, but as a summons to reorientation. The account is practice-first and formative. Religious practices do not merely express private experiences; they stabilize limit-appearances as ultimate or sacred, practically inhabitable, and transformatively authoritative, while training finite life to encounter later motifs under particular limit-forms. We develop the argument through three focal transformations---dependence as absolute ground, guilt as unconditional forgiveness, and desire as infinite love---and then test its range through gratitude, wonder, fragmentation, finitude, negative limit-appearances, confession, and non-theistic release. The account is bridge-neutral: it explains why religious appearances arise and become durable without deciding whether they disclose God, ultimate reality, or finite life under a limit-form. It culminates in a limit-orientation test that asks whether a practice preserves the finite motif it transforms, clarifies its practical pole of orientation, and returns finite life to repair, responsibility, gratitude, compassion, or release.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia. | 2003 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From dopamine to salience to psychosis--linking biology, pharmacology and phenomenology of psychosis. | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| How do the brain's time and space mediate consciousness and its different dimensions? Temporo-spatial theory of consciousness (TTC). | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The phenomenology of deep brain stimulation-induced changes in OCD: an enactive affordance-based model. | 2013 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Looking for the Self: Phenomenology, Neurophysiology and Philosophical Significance of Drug-induced Ego Dissolution | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |