When traditions dissolve: concept, transcendence, and return
PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) February 8, 2026 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18523328 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Conceptual framework Transcendence philosophy Conceptual schema Mediation Phenomenon Experiential learning Luck Religious experience Islam Religious pluralism Epistemology Negation Terminology Function biology |
| Key points | Argues that religious conceptual frameworks, when fully enacted, dissolve into a trans-conceptual horizon, and that this dissolution is not a negation but a completion of their formative role, with mysticism as an internal culmination of religious practice. |
Abstract
Religious traditions across cultures are structured around conceptual frameworks that articulate ultimate reality and prescribe practices by which practitioners orient themselves toward it. While these frameworks are indispensable for religious formation, this paper argues that they possess an internal limit: when fully enacted, they reach a point at which conceptual mediation ceases to function and dissolves. This dissolution should not be understood as the negation of religion or belief, but as the completion of the formative role concepts play within religious practice. Rather than identifying shared metaphysical doctrines or experiential contents, the paper advances a structural account of convergence across traditions. It argues that diverse religious paths independently generate a trans-conceptual horizon characterised by unspecifiability – the point at which conceptual articulation no longer governs religious orientation. The universality of this horizon lies not in doctrinal agreement, but in the shared exhaustion of conceptual mediation that emerges within distinct traditions. The paper further proposes that transcendence is most often precipitated by epistemic breakdown, in which established religious frameworks fail to provide further orientation or meaning. Crucially, transcendence does not culminate in withdrawal from religious life. Drawing on examples from Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism, the paper shows that those who reach this limit frequently re-engage their traditions out of compassion, employing conceptual forms provisionally as pedagogical tools to guide others. By articulating this cycle of conceptual formation, dissolution, and return, the paper reframes mysticism as an internal culmination of religious practice rather than as a marginal or exceptional phenomenon.