Skip to content

Transhumanist immortality: Understanding the dream as a nightmare

Pablo García-Barranquero

March 14, 2021 DOI: 10.12775/setf.2021.006 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Dreaming
Key points Argues that a specific type of indefinite life is more desirable than our current limited life, while rejecting the goal of immortality.

Abstract

This paper offers new arguments to reject the alleged dream of immortality. In order to do this, I firstly introduce an amendment to Michael Hauskeller’s approach of the “immortalist fallacy”. I argue that the conclusion “we (normally) do not want to live forever” does not follow from the premise “we (normally) do not want to die”. Next, I propose the philosophical turn from “normally” to “under these circumstances” to resolve this logical error. Then, I review strong philosophical critiques of this transhumanist purpose of immortality in the literature. There are two key questions related to the possibility of fulfilling this goal: the hard problem of consciousness and the personal identity dilemma. Finally, I defend a specific type of indefinite life and justify that it is more desirable than our current limited life.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on dreaming, most cited first.

Explore topics