Skip to content

The Near-Death Experience and the Question of Immortality: A Philosophical Approach

Stephen D. Smith

DOI: 10.32388/m2vq2f (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Near-death experience
Key points Argues that the long-running debate over whether near-death experience accounts can serve as evidence for an afterlife has overlooked a more fundamental question: whether any form of afterlife would be truly desirable, and whether a state of immortality would be any more purposive than oblivion.

Abstract

From tentative beginnings the literature on near-death experiences has mushroomed beyond all computation. In the nature of the case, the bulk of this literature depends very much on anecdotal evidence and presupposes that those who claim to have experienced such phenomena are telling their stories in good faith. Despite a minority of dissenting voices, most of the doctors, psychologists and neuroscientists working in this field of study at least entertain the possibility that the stories related by their patients or subjects, whether spontaneously or formally, may serve as evidence for some kind of afterlife. The debate over whether or not this is a valid approach has been well rehearsed during the past thirty years, and although it would be tempting to add to it here, there is a more fundamental question to consider which, while having been aired in the field of philosophy, seems to have escaped notice among participants of the present debate. The question is whether any form of afterlife would be truly desirable. And would a state of immortality be any more purposive than oblivion? Following some preliminary discussion, this will be the burden of our song.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on near-death experience, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics