Reflections of a Natural Scientist on Panpsychism
Journal of Consciousness Studies 2021 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.28.9.065 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key points | Argues that integrated information theory resolves panpsychism's combination problem and offers a research program for progress on the mind–body problem, whereas panpsychism does not. |
Abstract
Panpsychism shares many intuitions with integrated information theory (IIT), in particular that consciousness is an intrinsic fundamental property of reality, is graded, and can be found in small amounts in simple physical systems. Unlike panpsychism, however, IIT clearly articulates which systems are conscious and which ones are not (resolving panpsychism's combination problem) and why consciousness can be adaptive. The systemic weakness of panpsychism, or any other -ism, is that they fail to offer a protracted conceptual, let alone empirical, research programme that yields novel insights or proposes new experiments. Without those, progress on the mindâ–“body problem will not occur.
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- A landscape of consciousness: Toward a taxonomy of explanations and implications. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology August 1, 2024
- A link between consciousness and the wetware of metabolism Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2026
- Neural Voices of Patients with Severe Brain Injury? Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics January 3, 2025
- Panpsychism and the mind-body problem in contemporary analytic philosophy Intellectual History Review December 7, 2023
- Philosophy and neuroscience on consciousness - response to Felipe León and Dan Zahavi. Acta Neurochirurgica November 10, 2023