JavaScript is disabled in your browser. You can still read and search, but features like search previews, menus, and forms may not work until it's enabled.

Naturalism, Religiosity and Panpsychism: two distinct paths for William James and Carl Jung.

PsyArXiv April 4, 2023 preprint DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/cu2j9 (opens in new tab)

Relevant Not relevant

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract

Characteristics	Theoretical or philosophical paper
Key points	Argues that William James and Carl Jung took distinct intellectual paths from a shared concern with religious experience, with James embracing naturalism and Jung developing a panpsychist metaphysics.

Abstract

Naturalism, Religiosity and Panpsychism: two distinct paths for William James and Carl Jung.

William James' Varieties of Religious Experience and Jungian Varieties of Human Nature: The nature of the relationship between religious experience, belief and psychological type Journal of Beliefs and Values August 1, 2003
Between Materialism and Spiritualism: From the Problem of Causality to the Holistic Representation of Psychic Reality in the Works of W. James Bulletin of Liberal Arts University 2026
The impact of James's Varieties of Religious Experience on Jung's work. History of psychology February 1, 2020 6 citations
William James on divine intimacy: psychical research, cosmological realism and a circumscribed re-reading of The Varieties of Religious Experience History of the Human Sciences May 1, 2006
Judeo-Christian religious experience and psychopathology: the legacy of William James. Transcultural Psychiatry September 1, 2010 30 citations