Skip to content

Preliminary feasibility of mindfulness in motion to improve physiological biomarkers of wellbeing in healthcare providers during dayshift hours

Justin J Merrigan, Maryanna Klatt, Catherine Quatman-Yates, Angela Emerson, Jamie Kronenberg, Morgan Orr, Jacqueline Caputo, Kayla Daniel, Anne-Marie Duchemin, Beth Steinberg, Joshua A Hagen

Discover Public Health May 25, 2025 DOI: 10.1186/s12982-025-00690-8 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Sample size 19
Population Healthcare providers
Intervention Mindfulness in Motion (MIM)
Duration 8-week intervention
Topics Breathwork Meditation
Keywords Parasympathetic Autonomic nervous system Mental health
Key findings Mindfulness in Motion improved heart rate variability, slowed respiration rate, and increased resilience in healthcare providers over eight weekly sessions.

Abstract

Abstract Mindfulness in Motion (MIM) can improve stress, resiliency, and burnout in healthcare providers but physiological outcomes are unknown. Thus, this study evaluated the effects of MIM on respiration rate (RR), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV). Nineteen healthcare providers wore chest strap electrocardiography (ECG) devices and remained still and seated while data were recorded for 5 min prior to (MIM-Start) and after completing (MIM-End) each of the 8 weekly MIM sessions. Metrics included: HR, RR, root-mean square of successive differences between R–R intervals (RMSSD), standard deviation of R–R intervals (SDNN), absolute low frequency power (LF), and absolute high frequency power (HF). At MIM-End, average SDNN (47.8 ± 26.6 vs. 38.2 ± 16.7 ms) and LF Power (2375 ± 3306 vs. 906 ± 1272 ms2) were greater and RR was slower (11.9 ± 3.0 v. 13.9 ± 3.0 bpm) than MIM-Start (p < 0.05). The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale increased from Week-1 (27.7 ± 4.8) to Week-8 (31.5 ± 4.8, p < 0.001). Compared to Week-1, HR was slower and RMSSD was greater during weeks 2, 3, and 4. There were increases in SDNN and LF, as well as decreases in RR, HF Power, and LF/HF Ratio at MIM-Start for some later weeks compared to MIM-Start at Week-1 (p < 0.05). For healthcare workers in normal work hours, respiration rates were slower and HRV improved but HRV frequency metrics could suggest slight physiological arousal at the end of MIM sessions. These results should be taken with caution, but MIM improved physiological biomarkers of stress at the start of some of the 8 weekly sessions.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness Undergraduate students 2006 Observational cohort
Effectiveness of a meditation-based stress reduction program in the treatment of anxiety disorders Patients with generalized anxiety disorder or panic disorder with or without agoraphobia 1992 Observational cohort n = 22
Meditation experience is associated with increased cortical thickness Participants with extensive Insight meditation experience and matched controls 2005 Observational cohort n = 20
Meditation experience is associated with differences in default mode network activity and connectivity Experienced meditators and matched meditation-naive controls 2011 Observational cohort
Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice Long-term Buddhist practitioners and controls 2004 Observational cohort

Citations in the library

Explore topics