Skip to content

A repeated awakening study exploring the capacity of complexity measures to capture dreaming during propofol sedation

Imad J. Bajwa, André Sevenius Nilsen, René Skukies, Arnfinn Aamodt, Gernot Ernst, Johan F. Storm, Bjørn Erik Juel

Scientific Reports September 24, 2025 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-12695-z (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Experimental study Peer reviewed
Sample size 20
Population Healthy participants
Intervention propofol sedation
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Electroencephalography Sedation Propofol Level of consciousness Persistent vegetative state Anesthesia Burst suppression Altered state
Citations 3
Key findings EEG complexity measures decreased from awake to sedated states but did not differ between periods with and without reported dream experiences during propofol sedation.

Abstract

Abstract Patients undergoing general anesthesia are often assumed to be unconscious. However, it is known that conscious experiences in the form of dreams occur even in unresponsive states induced by anesthetics. Here, we recorded resting state electroencephalography (EEG) as well as EEG combined with TMS perturbations in 20 healthy participants during propofol sedation. Participants were repeatedly awoken from deep sedation and asked immediately whether they had experiences just before waking up and what they experienced. Out of the 52 attempted awakenings in this study, 24 produced reports of having had an experience, while there were 5 reports of no experience. In the remaining 23 attempts, the subject was either unarousable or the report too incoherent to provide information about their experience prior to awakening. We then tested whether two different consciousness measures based on EEG complexity—the state transitions perturbational complexity index (PCI st ) and single-channel Lempel-Ziv complexity (LZc)—differed between awakenings with and without experience. While our study confirms earlier findings that the EEG complexity measures significantly decrease from the awake state to the sedated state, we find no evidence that these measures differ between periods associated with reports of dreaming and non-dreaming, within the sedated state. A few interpretations and limitations are discussed.

Comparable studies

Other experimental studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming Verified by Volitional Communication during Rem Sleep Selected subjects proficient in lucid dreaming 1981 Experimental study n = 5
Incorporation of concern- and nonconcern-related verbal stimuli into dream content. Seven male subjects studied during sleep Stages 2 and REM 1981 Experimental study n = 7
Lucid Dreaming and Alpha Activity: A Preliminary Report Good dream recallers 1982 Experimental study n = 10
Lucid dreaming during NREM sleep: Two case reports 2012 Sleep laboratory study
The Dream Catcher experiment: blinded analyses failed to detect markers of dreaming consciousness in EEG spectral power. Human participants during sleep 2020 Experimental study with blinded classification n = 9

Citations in the library

Explore topics