Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Dream recall frequency is associated with attention rather than with working memory abilities.

Salomé Blain, Aurélien De la Chapelle, Anne Caclin, Aurélie Bidet-Caulet, Perrine Ruby

Journal of Sleep Research October 1, 2022 DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13557 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

People who frequently recall their dreams are more easily distracted by hard-to-ignore auditory stimuli than those who rarely recall dreams. Using a new task that tests selective attention and working memory together, the study found that high dream recallers were slower and less accurate when a distractor was difficult to ignore, while low recallers were much less affected. The groups performed similarly on working memory load. This provides the first behavioral evidence that attentional differences exist between high and low dream recallers, supporting the idea that attentional processes play a role in dream recall.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Observational cohort Peer reviewed
Population Low and high dream recallers
Topics Dreaming
Keywords Attentional filter Audition Memory encoding
Key finding High dream recallers showed less resistance to hard-to-ignore distractors than low dream recallers, providing the first behavioral evidence of attentional differences between the groups.

Abstract

Several factors influencing dream recall frequency (DRF) have been identified, but some remain poorly understood. One way to study DRF is to compare cognitive processes in low and high dream recallers (LR and HR). According to the arousal-retrieval model, long-term memory encoding of a dream requires wakefulness while its multisensory short-term memory is still alive. Previous studies showed contradictory results concerning short-term memory differences between LR and HR. It has also been found that extreme DRFs are associated with different electrophysiological traits related to attentional processes. However, to date, there is no evidence for attentional differences between LR and HR at the behavioural level. To further investigate attention and working memory in HR and LR, we used a newly-developed challenging paradigm called "MEMAT" (for MEMory and ATtention), which allows the study of selective attention and working memory interaction during memory encoding of non-verbal auditory stimuli. We manipulated the difficulties of the distractor to ignore and of the memory task. The performance of the two groups were not differentially impacted by working memory load. However, HR were slower and less accurate in the presence of a hard rather than easy to-ignore distractor, while LR were much less impacted by the distractor difficulty. Therefore, we show behavioural evidence towards less resistance to hard-to-ignore distractors in HR. Using a challenging task, we show for the first time, attentional differences between HR and LR at the behavioural level. The impact of auditory attention and working memory on dream recall is discussed.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment