Skip to content

Nightmare Prevalence, Nightmare Distress, and Self-Reported Psychological Disturbance

Ross Levin, Gary Fireman

Sleep 2002 DOI: 10.1093/sleep/25.2.205 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Prospective observational study Peer reviewed
Sample size 116
Population Young adults with a mean age of 20 years
Duration 21 consecutive nights of nightmare logging
Topics Dreaming
Citations 287
Key findings Frequent nightmares (three or more over three weeks) were associated with more dissociation, psychosis-proneness, and psychiatric symptoms than two or fewer nightmares. However, nightmare distress rather than nightmare prevalence accounted for much of the unique variance in predicting anxiety and depression, and no specific relationship between nightmares and psychosis-proneness was found.

Abstract

STUDY

Objectives: The relationship between nightmare prevalence, nightmare distress, and self-reported psychological disturbance was assessed prospectively.

Design: Differences in self-reported psychological disturbance as a function of nightmare prevalence was investigated by MANCOVA's with non-nightmare dreams as the covariate as well as Pearson correlations. The relative contribution of nightmare prevalence and distress to the prediction of psychological disturbance was investigated through multiple regression analyses.

Setting: N/A.

Participants: 116 participants (mean age = 20 years) completed self-report indices of depression, anxiety, dissociation, psychosis-proneness, and a psychiatric symptom checklist and kept a nightmare log for 21 consecutive nights.

Interventions: N/A.

Measurements: AND

Results: Frequent nightmares were associated with higher levels of psychological disturbance. Individuals who reported 3 or more nightmares across the 3 weeks reported more dissociation, psychosis-proneness and psychiatric symptoms than participants reporting 2 nightmares or less. However, nightmare prevalence and distress were not significantly correlated and differentially predicted to different types of waking psychological disturbance. Multiple regressions further indicated that nightmare distress accounted for much of the unique explanatory variance in predicting clinical states associated with high negative affect (anxiety and depression). Last, there was no evidence for a specific relationship between nightmares and psychosis-proneness.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that it is not the incidence of nightmares which is associated with poorer waking psychological functioning, especially anxiety and depression states, but the reported distress associated with the nightmare experience which is the critical variable in predicting higher psychological disturbance.

Comparable studies

Other observational and cohort studies on dreaming, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Lucid Dreaming: a State of Consciousness with Features of Both Waking and Non-Lucid Dreaming Student volunteers trained to become lucid and signal lucidity with horizontal eye... 2009 Observational study n = 6
Long-term effects of extreme situational stress on sleep and dreaming Survivors of traumatic events who complained of sleep disturbances, compared with... 1987 Case-control study n = 11
The relationship of nightmare frequency and nightmare distress to well‐being Adults who reported dreams 2004 Observational cohort n = 147
Dreaming in NREM Sleep: A High-Density EEG Study of Slow Waves and Spindles Healthy human subjects 2018 Observational cohort n = 14
Lucid Dreaming in Narcolepsy Consecutive patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls 2015 Case-control study n = 106

Citations in the library

Explore topics