Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Unlocking Flow Through Mindfulness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yvain Longaretti, Guy Cheron, David Zarka

The Journal of Psychology January 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1080/00223980.2025.2575309 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis of eight randomized controlled trials with 293 participants found that mindfulness-based interventions meaningfully enhance flow state and trait, a condition of deep absorption linked to improved performance and well-being. The analysis showed a positive effect (SMD = 0.777) with low heterogeneity. Mindfulness likely promotes flow by improving attention, present-moment awareness, and reducing self-critical thoughts. However, half the studies had a high risk of bias, and small sample sizes warrant caution. The findings suggest mindfulness practice can foster flow, but more rigorous research is needed.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Qualitative Peer reviewed
Sample size 293
Population Healthy participants
Intervention mindfulness-based interventions
Duration Median intervention duration 7 weeks
Keywords Attention regulation Athletes Executive function Positive psychology Well-being
Key finding Mindfulness-based interventions produce a positive effect on flow state and trait in healthy participants.

Abstract

Flow, a state of deep absorption in an activity, is linked to enhanced performance and well-being. Mindfulness, emphasizing present-moment awareness and acceptance, may promote flow. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the impact of mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) on flow state and trait in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, and Google Scholar were searched (2022, updated January 2024). Inclusion criteria followed PICOS standards: healthy participants following a MBI or control intervention, using validated flow assessments. Exclusion criteria were non-peer-reviewed, qualitative studies, non-RCT designs, and clinical populations. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's RoB2 tool. Eight RCTs (293 participants, 52% female, median intervention duration 7 weeks) met inclusion criteria. The random-effects meta-analysis showed a positive effect of MBIs on flow outcomes (SMD = 0.777, 95% CI [0.505, 1.049], p < 0.0001), with low heterogeneity (I2 = 22.59%, PI = [0.3230, 1.2314]). Publication bias was minimal, as indicated by Egger's test (p = 0.108) and trim-and-fill analyses. Although 50% of the included studies were rated as having a high risk of bias, sensitivity analyses did not reveal important deviations from mean effect. Studies suggest that MBIs meaningfully enhance flow state and trait. Mechanistic insights suggest that MBIs improve flow by enhancing attention, present-moment awareness, and reducing self-critical thoughts. However, small sample sizes and high risk of bias warrant caution. Future research should investigate dose-response and follow-up effects of interventions on specific dimensions of flow and ensure a rigorous assessment of bias risk and evidence synthesis.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment