Skip to content

Who Sticks with Meditation? Rates and Predictors of Persistence in a Population-based Sample in the USA.

Sin U Lam, Kevin M. Riordan, Otto Simonsson, Richard J. Davidson, Simon B. Goldberg

Mindfulness 2023 DOI: 10.1007/s12671-022-02061-9 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Observational cross-sectional survey Preregistered Peer reviewed
Sample size 953
Population U.S. general population adults
Topics Meditation
Keywords Attrition Health behavior Meditation practice patterns Persistence Population-based sampling
Key findings Factors positively associated with meditation persistence included having spoken with a meditation teacher, higher perceived effectiveness, positive social norms, lower barriers, higher conscientiousness, wellbeing growth mindset, and retreat experience; first exposure through technology and mental health motivation were negatively associated.

Abstract

Despite the well-documented psychological benefits of meditation practice, limited research has examined factors associated with meditation practice persistence. Like other health behaviors (e.g., exercise), non-persistence may undermine the effectiveness of meditation. We examined rates and correlates of meditation persistence using a population-based sample (n = 953) in the United States. Persistence was operationalized in two ways: number of lifetime practice sessions (i.e., lifetime persistence) and current practice frequency (i.e., current persistence). Consistent with the National Health Interview Survey, we defined meditation as mindfulness meditation, mantra meditation, and spiritual meditation. We examined factors related to the Reasoned Action Approach (RAA), a theory that has been used to explain adherence to health behaviors. Almost half of the sample (49.3%) indicated lifetime exposure to meditation and a third (35.0%) indicated practice in the past year. Factors positively associated with persistence (lifetime and/or current) included having spoken with a meditation teacher, higher perceived effectiveness of meditation, higher meditation-positive subjective norms, lower perceived barriers, higher conscientiousness, higher wellbeing growth mindset, and retreat experience. Factors negatively associated with persistence included first exposure through various forms of technology and having a mental health motivation for practice. First exposure through a smartphone app and first exposure through friends and family were not associated with lifetime or current persistence. Findings were unchanged after controlling for demographics and applying a false discovery rate p-value adjustment. These findings provide insights into factors that may promote persistence with meditation which can guide the delivery of meditation training. This study was preregistered at the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/4h86s).

Comparable studies

Other cross-sectional and survey studies on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples Experienced meditators and nonmeditating comparison groups 2008 Cross-sectional study
Neural Correlates of Dispositional Mindfulness During Affect Labeling Adult participants 2007 Observational cross-sectional n = 27
Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). School-aged children and adolescents 2011 Cross-sectional validation study n = 1,413
Mindfulness and self-compassion as predictors of psychological wellbeing in long-term meditators and matched nonmeditators Experienced meditators and demographically matched nonmeditators 2012 Cross-sectional study n = 152
Mechanisms of Action in the Inverse Relationship Between Mindfulness and Psychological Distress Undergraduates 2008 Cross-sectional, correlational

Citations in the library

Cited by 19

and 14 more in the library

Cites 20

and 15 more in the library

Explore topics