Skip to content

The Effects of Mindfulness and Meditation on Vagally Mediated Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis.

Lydia Brown, Alora A Rando, Kristina Eichel, Nicholas T. van Dam, Christopher M Celano, Jeff C Huffman, Meg E Morris

Psychosomatic Medicine July 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1097/psy.0000000000000900 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Mental health Heart rate Research design
Key findings Across 19 randomized controlled trials, mindfulness and meditation-based interventions did not significantly increase vagally mediated resting-state heart rate variability relative to control conditions (Hedges g = 0.38, 95% CI = -0.014 to 0.77; after removing an outlier, g = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.39). The authors conclude there is currently insufficient evidence that such interventions improve HRV.

Abstract

ABSTRACT:

Objective: Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of autonomic nervous system function associated with both physical and mental health. Many studies have suggested that mindfulness and meditation-based interventions (MBIs) are associated with improvements in HRV, but findings are mixed, and to date, no comprehensive meta-analysis has synthesized results.

Methods: Systematic literature searches were conducted using PsycINFO, Embase, Medline, CINAHL, ERIC, and Scopus to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of predominantly seated MBIs on resting-state vagally mediated HRV. Risk of bias was judged using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

Results: Nineteen RCTs met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Random-effects meta-analysis found that MBIs were not efficacious in increasing vagally mediated resting-state HRV relative to control conditions (Hedges g = 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −0.014 to 0.77). When removing an outlier ( g = 3.22), the effect size was reduced, CI narrowed, and findings remained nonsignificant ( g = 0.19, 95% CI = −0.02 to 0.39). High heterogeneity in results ( I 2 = 89.12%) could not be explained by a priori–determined moderators including intervention duration, study setting, and control type.

Conclusions: There is currently insufficient evidence to indicate that MBIs lead to improvements in vagally mediated HRV over control conditions. Future large, well-designed RCTs with low risk of methodological bias could help add to the current evidence to elucidate any role MBIs might play in impacting HRV.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Cited by 40

and 35 more in the library

Cites 21

and 16 more in the library

Explore topics