Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Consciousness as a Projection of the Unmanifest: Philosophical and Technological Perspectives

Andrey Andrey

International Journal of Philosophy November 9, 2025 DOI: 10.47941/ijp.3314 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

Consciousness is not passive but is actively projected by the brain from an underlying, unseen realm that is both everything and nothing, shaping human experience. Drawing on Buddhist scriptures, Plato's cave, neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and emerging technologies, the paper argues that the brain projects a fuzzy essence into illusions of opposites, time, and solid objects that serve everyday life. Future technologies could enable redesigning neurons to perceive phenomena like gravitational waves or extra dimensions. Buddhist ethics of non-violence and compassion can guide equitable sharing of such powers, with implications for education and consciousness engineering.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Buddhism
Keywords Metaphysics Realm Materialism Projection relational algebra
Key finding Argues that consciousness is an active brain projection from a fundamental, empty-yet-full realm, and that emerging technologies could enable perception of normally inaccessible phenomena, guided by Buddhist ethics.

Abstract

Purpose: This paper dives into consciousness as a kind of projection from this vast, unseen realm that's both everything and nothing, shaping how we humans experience the world. Methodology: The work blends bold speculation with grounded evidence from metaphysics and science. It pulls from ancient Buddhist scriptures, timeless philosophical stories like Plato's cave, and cutting-edge research in neuroscience (think studies on how we perceive things, Hoffman's idea of reality as a user interface, and the brain's ability to rewire itself). It also nods to quantum mechanics (like particles in superposition or the Orch-OR theory of consciousness) and hot new tech (CRISPR gene editing, brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink, and lab-grown mini-brains called cerebral organoids). Along the way, it weighs contrasting ideas—from hardcore materialists like Dennett to panpsychists like Chalmers—and sketches out wild possibilities for the next 50 to 500 years through a mix of disciplines. Findings: At its core, consciousness isn't passive—it's our brains actively projecting a fuzzy, underlying essence into the illusions of opposites, time, and solid objects that work just fine for everyday life. Tech could let us redesign neurons to "see" things like gravitational waves, magnetic fields, time loops, or extra dimensions. If you're a materialist, this means we're just crafting fancier illusions; if you're into panpsychism, it's about plugging into a shared cosmic awareness. Sure, there are pitfalls—like splintering our sense of self or getting too attached to these new experiences—but Buddhist ethics (non-violence through ahimsa, boundless compassion via karuṇā) can steer us toward sharing this power widely. Imagine kids in schools building their own conscious creations, echoing the Buddhist truths of no fixed self (anātman) and everything being deeply connected. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: Theoretically, it bridges śūnyatā with quantum-neural models, resolving the hard problem via a "kaleidoscope" metaphor. In practice, it empowers global Buddhist traditions for ethical consciousness engineering, enhancing empathy and insight. For policy, it advocates inclusive frameworks prioritizing non-harming and equity, positioning Buddhism as a mediator for techno-spiritual governance in diverse contexts.

Explore topics

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment