The projective theory of consciousness: from neuroscience to philosophical psychology
Trans/Form/Ação 2018 DOI: 10.1590/0101-3173.2018.v41esp.11.p199 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Qualitative Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 24 |
| Key points | Proposes that projection is a bridge principle connecting the neurobiological systems of knowing, feeling, and acting with the bipolar structure of consciousness, generating the sense of self and the sense of the world as an informational phenomenal field experienced in the first-person perspective. The author relates this hypothesis to phenomenal and higher-order thought approaches and a mathematical model of projection, and briefly mentions eight ways to test it. |
Abstract
Abstract: The development of the interdisciplinary areas of cognitive, affective and action neurosciences contributes to the identification of neurobiological bases of conscious experience. The structure of consciousness was philosophically conceived a century ago (HUSSERL, 1913) as consisting of a subjective pole, the bearer of experiences, and an objective pole composed of experienced contents. In more recent formulations, Nagel (1974) refers to a “point of view”, in which qualitative experiences are anchored, while Velmans (1990, 1993, 2009, 2017) understands that phenomenal content is composed of mental representations “projected” to the space external to the brains that construct them. In Freudian psychology, the conscious mind contains a tension between the Id and the Ego (FREUD, 1913). How to relate this bipolar structure with the results of neuroscience? I propose the notion of projection [also used by Williford et al. (2012)] as a bridge principle connecting the neurobiological systems of knowing, feeling and acting with the bipolar structure. The projective process is considered responsible for the generation of the sense of self and the sense of the world, composing an informational phenomenal field generated by the nervous system and experienced in the first-person perspective. After presenting the projective hypothesis, I discuss its philosophical status, relating it to the phenomenal (BLOCK, 1995, 2008, 2011) and high-order thought (ROSENTHAL, 2006; BROWN, 2014) approaches, and a mathematical model of projection (RUDRAUF et al., 2017). Eight ways of testing the status of the projective hypothesis are briefly mentioned.
Citations in the library
Cited by 6
- The fish in the creek is sentient, even if I can’t speak with it Trans/Form/Ação 2018
- Projecting the trees but ignoring the forest: brief critique of Alfredo Pereira Jr.’s target paper Trans/Form/Ação 2018
- How to investigate perceptual projection: a commentary on Pereira Jr., “The projective theory of consciousness: from neuroscience to philosophical psychology” Trans/Form/Ação 2018
- Two paradoxes of projection Trans/Form/Ação 2018
- Representationalism can connect neuroscience and philosophy. Frontiers in cognition 2025
and 1 more in the library
Cites 13
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Ten Problems of Consciousness The MIT Press eBooks November 17, 1995
- Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences December 1, 2007
- The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness Oxford University Press eBooks July 9, 2020
- CONCEPTUAL SPACES AND CONSCIOUSNESS: INTEGRATING COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE PROCESSES International Journal of Machine Consciousness June 1, 2011
and 8 more in the library