Skip to content

Impact of meditation-only interventions on university students' resilience: A pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised actively and passively controlled trials.

Robin Jacob, Lorena Cascant Ortolano, Theresa Dicks, Pascal Kemmerer, Jennifer L Reichel, Viktoria Eggert, Thomas Rigotti, Pavel Dietz

Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being June 1, 2026 DOI: 10.1111/aphw.70152 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Systematic review and meta-analysis Randomized Peer reviewed
Sample size 8,728
Population University students
Intervention Meditation
Topics Meditation
Keywords Humans Stress, psychological Universities Resilience, psychological Rct University students Psychological resilience Network meta‐analysis
Key findings Meditation-only interventions showed little to no effect on direct resilience scales (SMD −0.11, 95% CI −0.63 to 0.41), a small improvement in resilience-related mental health outcomes (SMD 0.27, 95% CI 0.20–0.35), and a moderate improvement in resilience factors (SMD 0.54, 95% CI 0.34–0.73). The authors suggest these interventions may improve resilience-related mental health outcomes and resilience factors, but evidence for direct effects on resilience scales remains limited.

Abstract

Abstract: University students are at elevated risk of psychological distress, underscoring the need for interventions that promote resilience. Psychological resilience refers to the capacity to withstand or recover from stress. This systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluated the effects of meditation‐only interventions on resilience in university students compared with active and passive controls and examined whether effects varied by meditation style, intervention intensity, delivery mode or follow‐up length. A literature search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science identified randomised controlled trials involving university students who participated in meditation‐only interventions and reported resilience‐related outcomes. Pairwise random‐effects models, mixed‐effects meta‐regression and network meta‐analysis were used to estimate standardised mean differences (SMDs) at postintervention. Eighty‐eight studies with 8728 participants were included. The overall effect was −0.11 (95% CI = −0.63 to 0.41, I 2 = 59%) for resilience scales, 0.27 (95% CI = 0.20–0.35, I 2 = 40%) for resilience‐related mental health outcomes and 0.54 (95% CI = 0.34–0.73, I 2 = 76%) for resilience factors. These findings suggest that meditation‐only interventions may improve resilience‐related mental health outcomes and resilience factors, but evidence for direct effects on resilience scales remains limited. Interpretation is constrained by heterogeneity and limited power in moderation analyses.

Comparable studies

Other systematic reviews and meta-analyses on meditation, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being Diverse adult clinical populations 2014 Meta-analysis n = 3,515
Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for Stress Management in Healthy People: A Review and Meta-Analysis Healthy subjects 2009 Systematic review and meta-analysis
The psychological effects of meditation: A meta-analysis. Nonclinical groups of adult meditators 2012 Meta-analysis n = 163
Efficacy of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Prevention of Depressive Relapse Adults with recurrent depression in full or partial remission 2016 Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized controlled trials n = 1,258
Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction and Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive Therapy – a systematic review of randomized controlled trials 2011 Systematic review

Citations in the library

Explore topics