EEG Phase Slips Reveal Detailed Brain Activity Patterns of Novice Vipassana Meditators During Decision Making Tasks
Ratna Jyothi Kakumanu, Ajay Kumar Nair, Arun Sasidharan, Rahul Venugopal, Ravindra P. Nagendra, Bindu M Kutty, Ceon Ramon
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) September 9, 2025 preprint DOI: 10.1101/2025.09.03.674031 (opens in new tab) via OpenAlex
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractA novel approach using four EEG-based biomarkers—potentials, their first-order derivatives, and phase slip rates derived from each—distinguished novice Vipassana meditators from non-meditator controls. Phase slip rates, discontinuities in instantaneous phase representing cortical phase transitions, were computed from 128-channel EEG data collected during a visual oddball task. Eight novice Vipassana subjects and eight non-meditator controls each completed 50 trials; 44 artifact-free trials per subject were averaged. Spatiotemporal profiles of all four biomarkers differed significantly between groups, and the novice Vipassana subjects showed faster object recognition. The findings suggest phase slip rates offer a promising set of biomarkers for quantitative task-based EEG analyses.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 16 |
| Population | Novice Vipassana meditators and non-meditator controls |
| Keywords | Electroencephalography Pattern recognition psychology Neural activity Slip aerodynamics Phase matter |
| Key finding | Spatiotemporal profiles of EEG potentials, first-order derivatives, and phase slip rates differed significantly between novice Vipassana subjects and non-meditator controls, with the meditators showing faster object recognition. |
Abstract
Abstract Our study adopted a novel approach, utilizing four biomarkers, namely EEG potentials, their first-order derivatives, and phase slip rates derived from each, to discern the differences between novice Vipassana (NVP) subjects and non-meditator controls (NMC). Phase slip rates are discontinuities in instantaneous phase that represent cortical phase transitions, indicating a significant change in the overall brain state. We employed 128-channel EEG data from eight NMC and eight NVP subjects, collected during a gamified protocol, to investigate object identification within a visual oddball paradigm. EEG was continuously acquired during the 50 trials for each subject. We retained 44 artifact-free trials per subject (the minimum common across all subjects) and computed within-subject averages. The EEGs were then averaged separately for NMC and NVP subjects. The EEG was filtered in the alpha band, and the phase was extracted using the Hilbert transform, unwrapped, and the phase slip rates were computed. A montage layout of electrodes was used to make the spatiotemporal plots of biomarkers. Our findings revealed that the spatiotemporal profiles of all four biomarkers differed significantly between the two groups of subjects. Furthermore, the NVP subjects demonstrated faster object recognition. These results not only provide a unique method to use phase slip rates to quantify cognitive differences between NMC and NVP subjects but also present a promising set of biomarkers for quantitative task-based EEG analyses.