Changes in subjective experience elicited by direct stimulation of the human orbitofrontal cortex
K. Fox, Jennifer Yih, Omri Raccah, S. Pendekanti, L. Limbach, Daniella D. Maydan, J. Parvizi
Neurology September 19, 2018 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006358 (opens in new tab) via Semantic Scholar
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractElectrical stimulation of the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in 22 neurosurgical patients with epilepsy produced a range of subjective experiences, mostly neutral or negative (aversive smells, tastes, sadness, anger). Negatively valenced experiences were more common with left-hemisphere stimulation, while neutral effects were strongly right-lateralized. Most elicited effects came from stimulation around the transverse orbital sulcus, with no effects from the most anterior OFC. The findings suggest a dissociation between a silent anterior OFC and a responsive middle/posterior OFC, and support a causal role for the OFC in integrating affect with multimodal sensory experience.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 22 |
| Population | Patients with intractable focal epilepsy implanted with intracranial electrodes |
| Intervention | direct cortical stimulation |
| Keywords | Psychology Medicine |
| Key finding | Direct cortical stimulation of the orbitofrontal cortex elicits affective, olfactory, gustatory, and somatosensory changes, with a silent anterior OFC and a responsive middle/posterior OFC, and left lateralization of negatively valenced effects. |
Abstract
Objective We applied direct cortical stimulation (DCS) to the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) in neurosurgical patients implanted with intracranial electrodes to probe, with high anatomic precision, the causal link between the OFC and human subjective experience. Methods We administered 272 instances of DCS at 172 OFC sites in 22 patients with intractable focal epilepsy (from 2011 to 2017), none of whom had seizures originating from the OFC. Results Our observations revealed a rich variety of affective, olfactory, gustatory, and somatosensory changes in the subjective domain. Elicited experiences were largely neutral or negatively valenced (e.g., aversive smells and tastes, sadness, and anger). Evidence was found for preferential left lateralization of negatively valenced experiences and strong right lateralization of neutral effects. Moreover, most of the elicited effects were observed after stimulation of OFC tissue around the transverse orbital sulcus, and none were seen in the most anterior aspects of the OFC. Conclusions Our study yielded 3 central findings: first, a dissociation between the “silent” anterior and nonsilent middle/posterior OFC where stimulation clearly elicits changes in subjective experience; second, evidence that the OFC might play a causal role in integrating affect and multimodal sensory experiences; and third, clear evidence for left lateralization of negatively valenced effects. Our findings provide important information for clinicians treating OFC injury or planning OFC resection and scientists seeking to understand the brain basis for the integration of sensation, cognition, and affect.