Does the Prefrontal Cortex Play an Essential Role in Consciousness? Insights from Intracranial Electrical Stimulation of the Human Brain
Omri Raccah, Ned Block, K. Fox
Journal of Neuroscience March 10, 2021 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.1141-20.2020 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Systematic review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Intervention | intracranial electrical stimulation |
| Key findings | Intracranial electrical stimulation of only the orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex reliably perturbs conscious experience, while stimulation of anterolateral prefrontal sites seldom does, challenging higher-order and global workspace theories that point to the PFC as the basis for conscious perception. |
Abstract
A central debate in philosophy and neuroscience pertains to whether PFC activity plays an essential role in the neural basis of consciousness. Neuroimaging and electrophysiology studies have revealed that the contents of conscious perceptual experience can be successfully decoded from PFC activity, but these findings might be confounded by postperceptual cognitive processes, such as thinking, reasoning, and decision-making, that are not necessary for consciousness. To clarify the involvement of the PFC in consciousness, we present a synthesis of research that has used intracranial electrical stimulation (iES) for the causal modulation of neural activity in the human PFC. This research provides compelling evidence that iES of only certain prefrontal regions (i.e., orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex) reliably perturbs conscious experience. Conversely, stimulation of anterolateral prefrontal sites, often considered crucial in higher-order and global workspace theories of consciousness, seldom elicits any reportable alterations in consciousness. Furthermore, the wide variety of iES-elicited effects in the PFC (e.g., emotions, thoughts, and olfactory and visual hallucinations) exhibits no clear relation to the immediate environment. Therefore, there is no evidence for the kinds of alterations in ongoing perceptual experience that would be predicted by higher-order or global workspace theories. Nevertheless, effects in the orbitofrontal and anterior cingulate cortices suggest a specific role for these PFC subregions in supporting emotional aspects of conscious experience. Overall, this evidence presents a challenge for higher-order and global workspace theories, which commonly point to the PFC as the basis for conscious perception based on correlative and possibly confounded information.
Citations in the library
Cited by 38
- Theories of consciousness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience July 1, 2022
- Decoding rapidly presented visual stimuli from prefrontal ensembles without report nor post-perceptual processing. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2022
- Electromagnetism's Bridge Across the Explanatory Gap: How a Neuroscience/Physics Collaboration Delivers Explanation Into All Theories of Consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience June 16, 2022
- Implicit-explicit gradient of nondual awareness or consciousness as such. Neuroscience of Consciousness October 8, 2021
- Consciousness science: where are we, where are we going, and what if we get there? Frontiers in Science October 30, 2025
and 33 more in the library
Cites 23
- On a confusion about a function of consciousness Behavioral and Brain Sciences June 1, 1995
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- Are the Neural Correlates of Consciousness in the Front or in the Back of the Cerebral Cortex? Clinical and Neuroimaging Evidence Journal of Neuroscience October 4, 2017
- Exaggerated reports: reply to Block Analysis May 16, 2011
- Fidelity of first-person reports following intracranial neuromodulation of the human brain: An empirical assessment of sham stimulation in neurosurgical patients Brain Stimulation October 28, 2020
and 18 more in the library