James’ “Fringe” and “Qualia of Meaning”: A Proposal
Phenomenology and Mind September 17, 2018 DOI: 10.13128/phe_mi-20100 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Non-sensory fringe Holistic understanding |
| Key points | Proposes that qualia of meaning are experiences related to holistic understanding that have both an intentional cognitive and phenomenal aspect, distinct from but similar to the non-sensory fringe. |
Abstract
Many philosophers have made the distinction between two phenomenological aspects of consciousness, namely, the partition between clear and distinct contents/vague and peripheral feeling. Such a distinction is relevant for Husserl, while James (1890) provides the most comprehensive account of nucleus and fringe. A concept close to that of fringe, and in particular to the more recently proposed concept of non-sensory fringe, is that of qualia of meaning which I am here proposing. Qualia of meaning are experiences that relate to the holistic understanding of a certain set of elements of knowledge available to an individual and which as such can guide their thinking processes. These qualia have an intentional cognitive aspect connected to the phenomenal aspect. On the ground of these considerations, my main aim in this paper is to describe what qualia of meaning are and highlights differences and similarities with the non-sensory fringe.