Mindscape Collective is now The Consciousness Library. Same library, new name. You may need to sign in again. About the change
Skip to content

Extended mind and after: socially extended mind and actor-network.

Tetsuya Kono

Integrative psychological & behavioral science March 1, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s12124-013-9242-2 (opens in new tab) via PubMed

Summary

AI-generated from the abstract

The extended mind thesis (EM) holds that the mind includes not just the brain but the whole system of brain, body, and environment. Some philosophers and psychologists have recently extended this idea to social cognition (socially extended mind, or SEM). However, EM/SEM theory struggles to account for interactions involving opposition, antagonism, or conflict, and tends to treat the environment as passive or static, overlooking how non-human elements can direct and regulate human subjects. Actor-network theory (ANT), developed by Latour and Callon, is more persuasive on these points while sharing important ideas with EM/SEM. The author concludes that EM/SEM is best understood as a special case of actor-network—a system controllable by a human agent alone—and that understanding collective behavior requires studying the actor-networks in which individuals are situated.

Study at a glance

Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Key finding Argues that the extended mind thesis is best analyzed as a special case of actor-network theory, and that understanding collective behavior requires studying the actor-networks in which human individuals are situated.

Abstract

The concept of extended mind has been impressively developed over the last 10 years by many philosophers and cognitive scientists. The extended mind thesis (EM) affirms that the mind is not simply ensconced inside the head, but extends to the whole system of brain-body-environment. Recently, some philosophers and psychologists try to adapt the idea of EM to the domain of social cognition research. Mind is socially extended (SEM). However, EM/SEM theory has problems to analyze the interactions among a subject and its surroundings with opposition, antagonism, or conflict; it also tends to think that the environment surrounding the subject is passive or static, and to neglect the power of non-human actants to direct and regulate the human subject. In these points, actor-network theory (ANT) proposed by Latour and Callon is more persuasive, while sharing some important ideas with EM/SEM theory. Actor-network is a hybrid community which is composed of a series of heterogeneous elements, animate and inanimate for a certain period of time. I shall conclude that EM/SEM could be best analyzed as a special case of actor-network. EM/SEM is a system which can be controlled by a human agent alone. In order to understand collective behavior, philosophy and psychology have to study the actor-network in which human individuals are situated.

Comments

No comments yet.

Log in to comment