Markov blankets do not demarcate the boundaries of the mind.
Richard Menary, Alexander J Gillett
The Behavioral and brain sciences September 29, 2022 DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x22000371 (opens in new tab) via PubMed
Summary
AI-generated from the abstractThe authors agree with Bruineberg and colleagues' main claims but push for a stronger critique by focusing on the extended mind debate. They argue that even after distinguishing between Pearl's and Friston's versions of the Markov blanket, neither version is sufficient for determining the boundaries of the mind.
Study at a glance
| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Key finding | Argues that neither Pearl's nor Friston's version of the Markov blanket is sufficient for demarcating the boundaries of the mind. |
Abstract
We agree with Bruineberg and colleagues' main claims. However, we urge for a more forceful critique by focusing on the extended mind debate. We argue that even once the Pearl and Friston versions of the Markov blanket have been untangled, that neither is sufficient for tackling and resolving the question of demarcating the boundaries of the mind.