Conscious active inference I: A quantum model naturally implements the path integral needed for real-time planning and control.
Michael C Wiest, Arjan Singh Puniani
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal 2025 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2025.09.017 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Keywords | Active inference Bayesian brain Consciousness Microtubules Optimal control Orch or Predictive coding |
| Key points | Argues that classical Hodgkin-Huxley-style neurons are unlikely to perform the probabilistic computations required for conscious active inference quickly enough, and that a quantum model provides a biologically plausible implementation. |
Abstract
Active inference is a general framework for optimizing the behavior and learning of a sentient agential system. It may be interpreted as a general theory of sentient behavior and has been used to quantitatively model a wide variety of perceptual and behavioral contexts. Moreover, variables in neural process models of active inference appear to be represented by specific pathways in the brain, and they predict some features of actual neural responses and behavioral patterns in a variety of contexts. These applications support the validity of the active inference framework for describing real animals. However, implementing active inference in a conscious agent requires a system capable of sophisticated probabilistic computations, including a weighted average over its potential future trajectories-a path integral. Although it is straightforward to construct realistic classical biophysical neural models to approximate these computations in simple contexts, we argue in this first of two companion papers that classical Hodgkin-Huxley-style neurons are unlikely to be capable of performing these computations quickly enough in a realistic context. We then explain that conscious (temporally deep) active inference is mathematically equivalent to the path integral that underlies quantum dynamics. A quantum model thus provides a natural, biologically plausible mechanistic implementation of the processing required by active inference. In the second paper we review independent strong theoretical and experimental evidence from my (Wiest) lab and others' supporting the "Orch OR" quantum theory of consciousness as a collective quantum property of intraneuronal microtubules, which explains the existence of discrete cycles of perceptual inference.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Brain-penetrant microtubule-stabilizer epothilone B delays isoflurane-induced unconsciousness in mice. Neuropharmacology April 1, 2026
- Editorial: Quantum and quantum-like effects across neuroscience Frontiers in Human Neuroscience April 8, 2026
- Can physical fields bind consciousness? Limits to classical electromagnetism and quantum routes to phenomenal unity Physics of Life Reviews October 1, 2026
Cites 6
- In the interest of saving time: a critique of discrete perception Neuroscience of Consciousness 2018
- A quantum microtubule substrate of consciousness is experimentally supported and solves the binding and epiphenomenalism problems. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2025
- An active inference model of conscious access: How cognitive action selection reconciles the results of report and no-report paradigms. Current Research in Neurobiology 2022
- How do inner screens enable imaginative experience? Applying the free-energy principle directly to the study of conscious experience. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2025
- Active Inference as a Computational Framework for Consciousness Review of Philosophy and Psychology August 10, 2021
and 1 more in the library