Skip to content

Integrated information theory does not make plant consciousness more convincing.

Jon Mallatt, Lincoln Taiz, Andreas Draguhn, Michael R Blatt, David G Robinson

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications July 30, 2021 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.01.022 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Keywords Cellular consciousness Neurobiological naturalism Plant consciousness Plant neurobiology
Key points Argues that Integrated Information Theory cannot be used to prove plant consciousness because it allows for consciousness in nonliving systems, and that there is neither empirical evidence nor support from neuron-based theories for plant consciousness.

Abstract

It has been proposed by some plant scientists that plants are cognitive and conscious organisms, although this is a minority view. Here we present a brief summary of some of the arguments against this view, followed by a critique of an article in this same issue of Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications by Calvo, Baluska, and Trewavas (2020) that cites Integrated Information Theory (IIT) as providing additional support for plant consciousness. The authors base their argument on the assumptions that all cells are conscious and that consciousness is confined to life. However, IIT allows for consciousness in various nonliving systems, and thus does not restrict consciousness to living organisms. Therefore, IIT cannot be used to prove plant consciousness, for which there is neither empirical evidence nor support from other, neuron-based, theories of consciousness.

Citations in the library