Skip to content

Wanting to Be Understood Explains the Meta-Problem of Consciousness

Chrisantha Fernando, Dylan Banarse, Simon Osindero

arXiv Preprint Archive June 10, 2025 preprint

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper
Topics Philosophy of mind
Keywords Q-bio.nc Cs.ai Cognitive science Human communication Evolutionary psychology
Key points Argues that the hard problem of consciousness persists not because of an irreducible metaphysical gulf but because of an inflated epistemic demand driven by the human motivation to be perfectly understood.

Abstract

Because we are highly motivated to be understood, we created public external representations -- mime, language, art -- to externalise our inner states. We argue that such external representations are a pre-condition for access consciousness, the global availability of information for reasoning. Yet the bandwidth of access consciousness is tiny compared with the richness of `raw experience', so no external representation can reproduce that richness in full. Ordinarily an explanation of experience need only let an audience `grasp' the relevant pattern, not relive the phenomenon. But our drive to be understood, and our low level sensorimotor capacities for `grasping' so rich, that the demand for an explanation of the feel of experience cannot be ``satisfactory''. That inflated epistemic demand (the preeminence of our expectation that we could be perfectly understood by another or ourselves) rather than an irreducible metaphysical gulf -- keeps the hard problem of consciousness alive. But on the plus side, it seems we will simply never give up creating new ways to communicate and think about our experiences. In this view, to be consciously aware is to strive to have one's agency understood by oneself and others.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on philosophy of mind, most cited first.

Explore topics