The human visual system differentially represents subjectively and objectively invisible stimuli.
Timo Stein, Daniel Kaiser, Johannes J Fahrenfort, Simon van Gaal
PLoS Biology May 1, 2021 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001241 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Observational cohort Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Sample size | 43 |
| Population | Human participants |
| Key findings | Both subjective and objective invisibility show category information in visual cortex, but the extent and neural correlates of unconscious processing differ between measurement approaches. |
Abstract
The study of unconscious processing requires a measure of conscious awareness. Awareness measures can be either subjective (based on participant's report) or objective (based on perceptual performance). The preferred awareness measure depends on the theoretical position about consciousness and may influence conclusions about the extent of unconscious processing and about the neural correlates of consciousness. We obtained functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements from 43 subjects while they viewed masked faces and houses that were either subjectively or objectively invisible. Even for objectively invisible (perceptually indiscriminable) stimuli, we found significant category information in both early, lower-level visual areas and in higher-level visual cortex, although representations in anterior, category-selective ventrotemporal areas were less robust. For subjectively invisible stimuli, similar to visible stimuli, there was a clear posterior-to-anterior gradient in visual cortex, with stronger category information in ventrotemporal cortex than in early visual cortex. For objectively invisible stimuli, however, category information remained virtually unchanged from early visual cortex to object- and category-selective visual areas. These results demonstrate that although both objectively and subjectively invisible stimuli are represented in visual cortex, the extent of unconscious information processing is influenced by the measurement approach. Furthermore, our data show that subjective and objective approaches are associated with different neural correlates of consciousness and thus have implications for neural theories of consciousness.
Citations in the library
Cited by 16
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of consciousness science Neuroscience of Consciousness 2022
- An academic survey on theoretical foundations, common assumptions and the current state of the field of consciousness science June 14, 2021
- Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2025
- Criterion placement threatens the construct validity of neural measures of consciousness. Elife May 28, 2025
- Brain Representation in Conscious and Unconscious Vision. Journal of Cognition 2025
and 11 more in the library
Cites 17
- Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems Nature Reviews Neuroscience April 20, 2016
- No-Report Paradigms: Extracting the True Neural Correlates of Consciousness Trends in Cognitive Sciences November 13, 2015
- Distinct cortical codes and temporal dynamics for conscious and unconscious percepts Elife May 5, 2021
- Hard criteria for empirical theories of consciousness Cognitive Neuroscience July 14, 2020
- A little history goes a long way toward understanding why we study consciousness the way we do today. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences March 13, 2020
and 12 more in the library