Skip to content

Syntheses and analytical characterizations of the research chemical 1‐[1‐(2‐fluorophenyl)‐2‐phenylethyl]pyrrolidine (fluorolintane) and five of its isomers

Michael Dybek, Jason Wallach, Pierce V. Kavanagh, Tristan Colestock, Nadine Filemban, Geraldine Dowling, Folker Westphal, Simon Elliott, Adeboye Adejare, Simon D. Brandt

Drug Testing and Analysis April 30, 2019 DOI: 10.1002/dta.2608 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Analytical chemistry study Peer reviewed
Keywords Substituent Pyrrolidine Structural isomer Ring chemistry Mass spectrometry Diastereomer Stereochemistry Organic chemistry Chromatography
Citations 9
Key points Each of the six positional isomers of fluorolintane can be differentiated by gas chromatography chemical ionization triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry of the [M + H – HF]+ species.

Abstract

Abstract A number of substances based on the 1,2‐diarylethylamine template have been investigated for various potential clinical applications whereas others have been encountered as research chemicals sold for non‐medical use. Some of these substances have transpired to function as NMDA receptor antagonists that elicit dissociative effects in people who use these substances recreationally. 1‐[1‐(2‐Fluorophenyl)‐2‐phenylethyl]pyrrolidine (fluorolintane, 2‐F‐DPPy) has recently appeared as a research chemical, which users report has dissociative effects. One common difficulty encountered by stakeholders confronting the appearance of new psychoactive substances is the presence of positional isomers. In the case of fluorolintane, the presence of the fluorine substituent on either the phenyl and benzyl moieties of the 1,2‐diarylethylamine structure results in a total number of six possible racemic isomers, namely 2‐F‐, 3‐F‐, and 4‐F‐DPPy (phenyl ring substituents) and 2”‐F‐, 3”‐F‐, and 4”‐F‐DPPy (benzyl ring substituents). The present study reports the chemical syntheses and comprehensive analytical characterizations of the two sets of three positional isomers. These studies included various low‐ and high‐resolution mass spectrometry platforms, gas‐ and liquid chromatography (GC and LC), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and GC‐condensed phase and attenuated total reflection infrared spectroscopy analyses. The differentiation between each set of three isomers was possible under a variety of experimental conditions including GC chemical ionization triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometric analysis of the [M + H – HF] + species. The latter MS method was particularly helpful as it revealed distinct formations of product ions for each of the six investigated substances.

Citations in the library