4E Cognition and the Spectrum of Aesthetic Experience
JoLMA December 9, 2020 DOI: 10.30687/jolma/2723-9640/2020/02/001 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Citations | 17 |
| Key findings | No unified set of principles can make sense of all art everywhere. |
Abstract
We review 4E (embodied, embedded, extended and enactive) approaches to the analysis of art and aesthetic experience. We argue that extended mind analyses that focus on tool use miss important aspects, and that it requires 4 or more E’s to address the broad spectrum of aesthetic experiences that correlate to the broad variety of artistic genres. We develop an enactive, affordance-based approach to understanding art and aesthetic experience. Considering both the potential and the limitations of any particular approach, we argue that there is no one unified set of principles that will make sense of all art everywhere.
Citations in the library
Cited by 3
- Art and linguistic bodies: a transformative view Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences April 1, 2026
- Aesthesis, noesis, or both? Enactivism meets representationalism in aesthetics Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences November 22, 2024
- Embodied neuroaesthetics and the psychotherapeutic relational field. Frontiers in Psychology 2026
Cites 4
- Aesthetics and the Limits of the Extended Mind British Journal of Aesthetics March 13, 2019
- Cultural Affordances: Scaffolding Local Worlds Through Shared Intentionality and Regimes of Attention. Frontiers in Psychology July 26, 2016
- Affordances and the musically extended mind. Frontiers in Psychology January 6, 2014
- Making Sense of Sense-Making: Reflections on Enactive and Extended Mind Theories March 1, 2009