The Pragmatics, Embodiment, and Efficacy of Lived Experience Assessing the Core Tenets of Varela's Neurophenomenology
Journal of Consciousness Studies December 1, 2023 DOI: 10.53765/20512201.30.11.190 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Critical review Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Philosophy of mind |
| Citations | 10 |
| Key findings | Neurophenomenology has focused on only one of its three original tenets, and to reach its full potential it must integrate all three, particularly demonstrating that lived experience makes a difference to the living body's dynamics. |
Abstract
Varela's enactive approach to cognitive science has been elaborated into a theoretical framework of agency, sense-making, and sociality, while his key methodological innovation — neurophenomenology (NP) — continues to inspire empirical work. We argue that the enactive approach was originally expressed in NP as three core tenets: (1) phenomenological pragmatics, (2) embodied cognition, and (3) conscious efficacy. However, most efforts in NP have focused on applying tenet 1, while tenet 2 has received notably less attention, and there is even explicit distancing from tenet 3. By way of a critical review of four case studies, we show how NP thereby falls short of its full potential. Crucially, it needs to demonstrate that the first-person perspective matters, not only as a source of correlations with third-person data, but because lived experience, as such, makes a difference in its own right to the living body's dynamics. Given that methods for improving subjective reports have become accepted in human neuroscience (tenet 1), and given the increasing availability for recording multi-scalar organismic activity during embodied action (tenet 2), we propose it is time to integrate these research strands by using this issue of conscious efficacy as a pivot point (tenet 3). The development of genuinely experience-involving accounts of neurophysiological activity during embodied action holds promise for rebooting neurophenomenology in stronger form.
Comparable studies
Other narrative reviews on philosophy of mind, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body Consciousness: A Philosophy of Mindfulness and Somaesthetics | 2008 | Review article | |
| Phenomenology, Structure, and Dynamic of Psychedelic States | 2016 | Review | |
| Classic Hallucinogens and Mystical Experiences: Phenomenology and Neural Correlates. | 2018 | Review | |
| The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics. Individuals with lived experience of psychosis, family members, and carers | 2022 | Co-written bottom-up review | |
| From autopoiesis to neurophenomenology: Francisco Varela's exploration of the biophysics of being. | 2003 | Review |
Citations in the library
Cited by 5
- Irruption and Absorption: A 'Black-Box' Framework for How Mind and Matter Make a Difference to Each Other. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) March 27, 2024
- Neurophenomenology in Action: Integrating the First-Person Perspective into the Libet Experiment Mindfulness August 1, 2024
- Now is the time: operationalizing generative neurophenomenology through interpersonal methods. Neuroscience of Consciousness 2025
- Coupling first-person cognitive research with neurophilosophy and enactivism: An outline of arguments Adaptive Behavior July 19, 2024
- Irruption Theory: A Novel Conceptualization of the Enactive Account of Motivated Activity. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) May 2, 2023