Skip to content

Esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block vs. intercostal nerve block on quality of recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection: a randomized controlled factorial trial.

Jing-Hui Hu, Zhang-Zhen Zhong, Hai-Jing Shi, Jie Wang, Shaomu Chen, Xi-Sheng Shan, Hua-Yue Liu, Hong Liu, Lingzhong Meng, Fu-Hai Ji, Ke Peng

International Journal of Surgery 2025 DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002060 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Randomized controlled trial Peer reviewed
Sample size 100
Population Adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery at a university hospital in Suzhou, China
Interventions Esketamine Erector spinae plane block Intercostal nerve block Ropivacaine Flurbiprofen axetil Patient-controlled fentanyl
Dose 0.3 mg/kg
Duration 24 hours for primary outcome; additional assessments at 48 hours and hospital discharge
Topics Esketamine
Keywords Pain-management Anesthesia Surgery Nerve-blocks
Citations 21
Key findings Subanesthetic esketamine improved quality of recovery after thoracoscopic lung resection, while erector spinae plane block and intercostal nerve block provided comparable results.

Abstract

Multimodal analgesic strategy is pivotal for enhanced recovery after surgery. The objective of this trial was to assess the effect of subanesthetic esketamine vs. placebo combined with erector spinae plane block (ESPB) vs. intercostal nerve block (ICNB) on postoperative recovery following thoracoscopic lung resection. This randomized, controlled, 2×2 factorial trial was conducted at a university hospital in Suzhou, China. One hundred adult patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung surgery were randomized to one of four groups (esketamine-ESPB, esketamine-ICNB, placebo-ESPB, and placebo-ICNB) to receive i.v. esketamine 0.3 mg/kg or normal saline placebo combined with ESPB or ICNB using 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml. All patients received flurbiprofen axetil and patient-controlled fentanyl. The primary outcome was quality of recovery (QoR) at 24 h postoperatively, assessed using the QoR-15 scale, with a minimal clinically important difference of 6.0. The median age was 57 years and 52% were female. No significant interaction effect was found between esketamine and regional blocks on QoR ( P =0.215). The QoR-15 score at 24 h was 111.5±5.8 in the esketamine group vs. 105.4±4.5 in the placebo group (difference=6.1, 95% CI: 4.0-8.1; P <0.001); 109.7±6.2 in the ESPB group vs. 107.2±5.6 in the ICNB group (difference=2.5, 95% CI: 0.2-4.9; P =0.033; not statistically significant after Bonferroni correction). Additionally, esketamine resulted in higher QoR-15 scores at 48 h (difference=4.6) and hospital discharge (difference=1.6), while ESPB led to a higher QoR-15 score at 48 h (difference=3.0). For patients undergoing thoracoscopic lung resection, subanesthetic esketamine improved QoR after surgery, while ICNB can be used interchangeably with ESPB as a component of multimodal analgesia.

Comparable studies

Other randomized controlled trials on esketamine, most cited first.

Study Year Design Participants
Efficacy and Safety of Flexibly Dosed Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a Newly Initiated Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Active-Controlled Study Adults with moderate to severe nonpsychotic depression and a history of nonresponse to... 2019 Phase 3, double-blind, active-controlled, multicenter randomized controlled trial n = 227
Efficacy of Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant Treatment for Relapse Prevention in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults with treatment-resistant depression who achieved stable remission or stable... 2019 Phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized withdrawal study n = 297
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression Adults with DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of major depressive disorder and history of inadequate... 2017 Phase 2, double-blind, doubly randomized, delayed-start, placebo-controlled study n = 67
Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine for the Rapid Reduction of Symptoms of Depression and Suicidality in Patients at Imminent Risk for Suicide: Results of a Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study Depressed patients at imminent risk for suicide 2018 Randomized controlled trial n = 68
Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-Dose Esketamine Nasal Spray Combined With a New Oral Antidepressant in Treatment-Resistant Depression: Results of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled Study (TRANSFORM-1) Adults with moderate-to-severe depression and nonresponse to at least two... 2019 Randomized controlled trial n = 346

Citations in the library

Explore topics