The Model of Consciousness: An Analysis of Causation, Self, Gödel’s Incompleteness, and Buddhist Philosophy
Journal of Physics, Conference Series June 1, 2025 DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/3027/1/012014 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Buddhism |
| Key points | Argues that consciousness, as a non-material finite-state machine free from self-referencing, can achieve a complete and decidable understanding of reality, transcending the limitations of Gödel's incompleteness theorems. |
Abstract
This paper examines the limitations of analytical and computational methods in understanding reality, highlighting the secondary role of language and mathematics, which often leads to paradoxes. Gödel’s incompleteness theorems underscore the inherent incompleteness and undecidability in logical and computational systems, such as the Turing machine. We propose that consciousness, operating as a non-material and chaotic finite-state machine (FSM) devoid of self-referencing, can achieve a complete and decidable understanding of reality. This contrasts with the self-referencing nature of logical systems that leads to paradoxes and limitations. Through a conceptual model of the mind inspired by Theravāda Buddhist philosophy, we suggest that awareness of causation is free from self-referencing and coherent with the unpredictable yet causal and deterministic nature of reality. This alignment offers a pathway to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of causation. The model illustrates the tight integrity between consciousness and causation, proposing that awareness of the present moment of causation can transcend the limitations of Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. This awareness, free from analytical and computational constraints, preserves the integrity of conscious experience and provides a complete and decidable understanding of reality. Future research will focus on developing techniques to sustain this awareness, potentially leading to wisdom and deep insight into the fundamental nature of existence.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on buddhism, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mental balance and well-being: Building bridges between Buddhism and Western psychology. | 2006 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Buddhist Modernism and the Rhetoric of Meditative Experience | 1995 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Buddhist and Psychological Perspectives on Emotions and Well-Being | 2005 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Too Early to Tell: The Potential Impact and Challenges—Ethical and Otherwise—Inherent in the Mainstreaming of Dharma in an Increasingly Dystopian World | 2017 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| From self to nonself: The Nonself Theory | 2016 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |