Skip to content

Experimental Philosophy of Consciousness

Kevin Reuter

Oxford Studies in Experimental Philosophy August 1, 2024 DOI: 10.1093/9780198918905.003.0017 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Review Peer reviewed
Citations 3
Key findings People do not attribute phenomenally conscious states to entities like Microsoft or duplicated hamsters, and they accept the concept of unfelt pains, suggesting a complex folk understanding of consciousness.

Abstract

Abstract Experimental philosophy of consciousness aims to investigate and explain our thinking about phenomenally conscious states. Based on empirical studies, researchers have argued (a) that we lack a folk concept of consciousness, (b) that we do not think entities like Microsoft feel regret, (c) that unfelt pains are widely accepted, and (d) that people do not attribute phenomenally conscious states to duplicated hamsters. In this chapter, I review these and other intriguing claims about people’s understanding of phenomenal consciousness. In doing so, I also show why experimental philosophy of consciousness is challenging, although perhaps not quite as daunting as studying phenomenal consciousness itself.