Skip to content

The Challenge of Mysticism: a Primer from a Christian Perspective

Daniel H. Spencer

Sophia January 14, 2021 DOI: 10.1007/s11841-020-00822-4 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Mysticism
Keywords Prima facie Certainty Epistemology Metaphysics Christianity Meaning existential Philosophy of religion Consciousness Theology
Key points Argues that the phenomenon of mysticism plausibly implies one of two conclusions unpalatable for orthodox Christianity: either it suggests metaphysical views that call Christian tenets into question, or it represents an 'inner meaning' of Christianity that renders orthodox belief problematic.

Abstract

Abstract In this article, I discuss the relevance of the study of mysticism for Christian analytic theologians and philosophers of religion. I begin with a brief consideration of some reasons Christian academics might be reluctant to enter this field, and indicate that, somewhat surprisingly, the study of mysticism is something but seldom addressed in Christian analytic circles. With this background in place, I proceed to the primary two sections of the article. Section I deals with demarcating mysticism: for the purposes of this article alone, an experience will count as mystical if and only if it is strongly unitive, transcends everyday consciousness, and (allegedly) conveys epistemic certainty as to the veracity of the insights acquired. These three criteria are discussed in some depth. Section II turns to the challenge mysticism in this sense might present to the Christian philosopher or theologian. I argue that the phenomenon of mysticism might be seen plausibly to imply one of two conclusions, both of which appear to be unpalatable for the Christian. First, it might suggest certain metaphysical views which prima facie call key tenets of orthodox Christianity into question. Secondly, mystical experience might be understood as the ‘inner meaning’ of Christianity which renders the better part of orthodox Christian belief equally problematic (as evidenced in three Christian mystics I discuss). I then conclude with a reflection on how the discussion might proceed, suggesting once more that Christian analytic theologians and philosophers of religion have scarcely begun to ask the relevant questions, let alone answer them in any persuasive manner.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics