The Challenge of Mysticism: a Primer from a Christian Perspective
Daniel H. Spencer
Sophia January 14, 2021 DOI: 10.1007/s11841-020-00822-4 (opens in new tab)
Study at a glance
AI-extracted from the abstract| Characteristics | Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed |
|---|---|
| Topics | Mysticism |
| Keywords | Prima facie Certainty Epistemology Metaphysics Christianity Meaning existential Philosophy of religion Consciousness Theology |
| Key points | Argues that the phenomenon of mysticism plausibly implies one of two conclusions unpalatable for orthodox Christianity: either it suggests metaphysical views that call Christian tenets into question, or it represents an 'inner meaning' of Christianity that renders orthodox belief problematic. |
Abstract
Abstract In this article, I discuss the relevance of the study of mysticism for Christian analytic theologians and philosophers of religion. I begin with a brief consideration of some reasons Christian academics might be reluctant to enter this field, and indicate that, somewhat surprisingly, the study of mysticism is something but seldom addressed in Christian analytic circles. With this background in place, I proceed to the primary two sections of the article. Section I deals with demarcating mysticism: for the purposes of this article alone, an experience will count as mystical if and only if it is strongly unitive, transcends everyday consciousness, and (allegedly) conveys epistemic certainty as to the veracity of the insights acquired. These three criteria are discussed in some depth. Section II turns to the challenge mysticism in this sense might present to the Christian philosopher or theologian. I argue that the phenomenon of mysticism might be seen plausibly to imply one of two conclusions, both of which appear to be unpalatable for the Christian. First, it might suggest certain metaphysical views which prima facie call key tenets of orthodox Christianity into question. Secondly, mystical experience might be understood as the ‘inner meaning’ of Christianity which renders the better part of orthodox Christian belief equally problematic (as evidenced in three Christian mystics I discuss). I then conclude with a reflection on how the discussion might proceed, suggesting once more that Christian analytic theologians and philosophers of religion have scarcely begun to ask the relevant questions, let alone answer them in any persuasive manner.
Comparable studies
Other theoretical and historical papers on mysticism, most cited first.
| Study | Year | Design | Participants |
|---|---|---|---|
| The mystical mind: probing the biology of religious experience | 2000 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Religious and Mystical Experiences as Artifacts of Temporal Lobe Function: A General Hypothesis | 1983 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| The Problem of Pure Consciousness: Mysticism and Philosophy | 1993 | Edited collection of essays | |
| Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century | 2020 | Theoretical or philosophical paper | |
| Mysticism and schizophrenia: A phenomenological exploration of the structure of consciousness in the schizophrenia spectrum disorders. | 2016 | Theoretical or philosophical paper |
Citations in the library
Cites 5
- On Constructivism in Philosophy of Mysticism The Journal of Religion 2020
- ENTHEOGENS, MYSTICISM, AND NEUROSCIENCE Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science August 26, 2014
- BY ITS FRUITS? MYSTICAL AND VISIONARY STATES OF CONSCIOUSNESS OCCASIONED BY ENTHEOGENS Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science September 2, 2014
- The Comparative Study of Mysticism Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Religion September 3, 2015
- LIMITATIONS ON THE SCIENTIFIC STUDY OF DRUG-ENABLED MYSTICAL EXPERIENCES: with Virginia Ballesteros, “Applied Mysticism: A Drug-Enabled Visionary Experience against Moral Blindness”; and Richard H. Jones, “Limitations on the Scientific Study of Drug-Enabled Mystical Experiences.” Zygon 2019