Skip to content

Slippage: An Anthropology of Shamanism

Bruce Grant

Annual Review of Anthropology October 21, 2021 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110350 (opens in new tab)

Study at a glance

AI-extracted from the abstract
Characteristics Theoretical or philosophical paper Peer reviewed
Topics Shamanism
Keywords Pride Skepticism Colonialism History of anthropology Ethnology Epistemology Archaeology
Citations 14
Key points Argues that the centrality of shamanism in anthropology arises from a history of social relations where shamans are cast as translators of the unseen and as sites of anxiety in encounters across gender, class, and colonial race lines, and that anthropologists have found in shamans translators across social worlds who are not unlike themselves.

Abstract

If our knowledge of shamanism has been so abidingly partial, so impressively uneven, so deeply varied by history, and so enduringly skeptical for so long, how has its study come to occupy such pride of place in the anthropological canon? One answer comes in a history of social relations where shamans both are cast as translators of the unseen and are themselves sites of anxiety in a very real world, one of encounters across lines of gender, class, and colonial incursions often defined by race. This article contends that as anthropologists have cultivated a long and growing library of shamanic practice, many appear to have found, in a globally diverse range of spirit practitioners, translators across social worlds who are not unlike themselves, suggesting that in the shaman we find a remarkable history of anthropology.

Comparable studies

Other theoretical and historical papers on shamanism, most cited first.

Citations in the library

Explore topics